These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22143903)

  • 1. Monte Carlo simulation of the effect of focal spot size on contrast-detail detectability.
    Poletti J; McLean D
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2012 Mar; 35(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 22143903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Generalizing the MTF and DQE to include x-ray scatter and focal spot unsharpness: application to a new microangiographic system.
    Kyprianou IS; Rudin S; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):613-26. PubMed ID: 15789608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comprehensive model for x-ray projection imaging system efficiency and image quality characterization in the presence of scattered radiation.
    Monnin P; Verdun FR; Bosmans H; Pérez SR; Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 62(14):5691-5722. PubMed ID: 28557801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Method for measuring the focal spot size of an x-ray tube using a coded aperture mask and a digital detector.
    Russo P; Mettivier G
    Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):2099-115. PubMed ID: 21626943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monte Carlo calculation for microplanar beam radiography.
    Company FZ; Allen BJ; Mino C
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2000 Sep; 23(3):88-93. PubMed ID: 11210159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A new method for eliminating scatter components from a digital X-ray image by later processing].
    Kato H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 Sep; 62(9):1359-68. PubMed ID: 17013372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Monte Carlo-based model for simulation of digital chest tomosynthesis.
    Ullman G; Dance DR; Sandborg M; Carlsson GA; Svalkvist A; Båth M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):159-63. PubMed ID: 20203125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blurring artifacts in megavoltage radiography with a flat-panel imaging system: comparison of Monte Carlo simulations with measurements.
    Schach von Wittenau AE; Logan CM; Aufderheide MB; Slone DM
    Med Phys; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2559-70. PubMed ID: 12462723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast-detail phantom study for x-ray spectrum optimization regarding chest radiography using a cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.
    Hamer OW; Völk M; Zorger N; Borisch I; Büttner R; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
    Invest Radiol; 2004 Oct; 39(10):610-8. PubMed ID: 15377940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dose efficiency and low-contrast detectability of an amorphous silicon x-ray detector for digital radiography.
    Aufrichtig R; Xue P
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Sep; 45(9):2653-69. PubMed ID: 11008963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of focal spot size with slit camera using computed radiography and flat-panel based digital detectors.
    Rong XJ; Krugh KT; Shepard SJ; Geiser WR
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1768-75. PubMed ID: 12906194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Signal detectability in digital radiography: spatial domain figures of merit.
    Gagne RM; Boswell JS; Myers KJ
    Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):2180-93. PubMed ID: 12945984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monte Carlo simulation of a mammographic test phantom.
    Hunt RA; Dance DR; Pachoud M; Alm Carlsson G; Sandborg M; Ullman G; Verdun FR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):432-5. PubMed ID: 15933151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rejection and redistribution of scattered radiation in scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR): simulation with spot images.
    Liu X; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2718-29. PubMed ID: 17821980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
    Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monte Carlo simulation of primary electron production inside an a-selenium detector for x-ray mammography: physics.
    Sakellaris T; Spyrou G; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(16):3717-38. PubMed ID: 16077223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intensity distribution and impact of scatter for dual-source CT.
    Kyriakou Y; Kalender WA
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):6969-89. PubMed ID: 18029988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A scatter correction method for dual-energy digital mammography: Monte Carlo simulation.
    Ai K; Gao Y; Yu G
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2014; 22(5):653-71. PubMed ID: 25265925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Monte Carlo study of the influence of focal spot size, intensity distribution, breast thickness and magnification on spatial resolution of an a-Se digital mammography system using the generalized MTF.
    Sakellaris T; Koutalonis M; Spyrou G; Pascoal A
    Phys Med; 2014 May; 30(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 24011672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.