507 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22143981)
1. The use of specially designed tasks to enhance student interest in the cadaver dissection laboratory.
Kang SH; Shin JS; Hwang YI
Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 22143981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Student perceptions of an upper-level, undergraduate human anatomy laboratory course without cadavers.
Wright SJ
Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(3):146-57. PubMed ID: 22362500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of a rotational dissection system in gross anatomy.
Marshak DW; Oakes J; Hsieh PH; Chuang AZ; Cleary LJ
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):438-44. PubMed ID: 25358463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceptions of dissection by students in one medical school: beyond learning about anatomy. A qualitative study.
Lempp HK
Med Educ; 2005 Mar; 39(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 15733168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. "Safe Harbor": evaluation of a professionalism case discussion intervention for the gross anatomy course.
Spampinato CM; Wittich CM; Beckman TJ; Cha SS; Pawlina W
Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 24039220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Online dissection audio-visual resources for human anatomy: Undergraduate medical students' usage and learning outcomes.
Choi-Lundberg DL; Cuellar WA; Williams AM
Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):545-554. PubMed ID: 27802370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors influencing students' decisions to participate in a short "dissection experience" within a systemic anatomy course.
Larkin TA; McAndrew DJ
Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(4):225-31. PubMed ID: 23213067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating dissection in the gross anatomy course: Correlation between quality of laboratory dissection and students outcomes.
Nwachukwu C; Lachman N; Pawlina W
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 24799441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Learning surgically oriented anatomy in a student-run extracurricular club: an education through recreation initiative.
Ullah SM; Bodrogi A; Cristea O; Johnson M; McAlister VC
Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(3):165-70. PubMed ID: 22434649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of self-learning modules to facilitate learning of basic science concepts in an integrated medical curriculum.
Khalil MK; Nelson LD; Kibble JD
Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(5):219-26. PubMed ID: 20814914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical students' reactions to anatomic dissection and the phenomenon of cadaver naming.
Williams AD; Greenwald EE; Soricelli RL; DePace DM
Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(3):169-80. PubMed ID: 23913911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Objective and subjective assessment of reciprocal peer teaching in medical gross anatomy laboratory.
Bentley BS; Hill RV
Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(4):143-9. PubMed ID: 19637291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigating the use of quick response codes in the gross anatomy laboratory.
Traser CJ; Hoffman LA; Seifert MF; Wilson AB
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 25288343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What do students actually do during a dissection course? First steps towards understanding a complex learning experience.
Winkelmann A; Hendrix S; Kiessling C
Acad Med; 2007 Oct; 82(10):989-95. PubMed ID: 17895664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Coupled physical and digital cadaver dissection followed by a visual test protocol provides insights into the nature of anatomical knowledge and its evaluation.
Hisley KC; Anderson LD; Smith SE; Kavic SM; Tracy JK
Anat Sci Educ; 2008 Jan; 1(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 19177376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Near-peer teaching in an anatomy course with a low faculty-to-student ratio.
Durán CE; Bahena EN; Rodríguez Mde L; Baca GJ; Uresti AS; Elizondo-Omaña RE; López SG
Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 22383124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Students' evaluation on a two-stage anatomy curriculum.
Leung KK; Lue BH; Lu KS; Huang TS
Med Teach; 2006 Mar; 28(2):e59-63. PubMed ID: 16707286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Loosely-guided, self-directed learning versus strictly-guided, station-based learning in gross anatomy laboratory sessions.
Kooloos JG; de Waal Malefijt MC; Ruiter DJ; Vorstenbosch MA
Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(6):340-6. PubMed ID: 22653816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dissection videos do not improve anatomy examination scores.
Mahmud W; Hyder O; Butt J; Aftab A
Anat Sci Educ; 2011; 4(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 21265032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reduction of mental distress in the dissection course by introducing the body donor experience through anatomical demonstrations of organ systems.
Böckers A; Baader C; Fassnacht UK; Ochsner W; Böckers TM
Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(6):321-9. PubMed ID: 22653802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
