BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

481 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22144064)

  • 1. [Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses)].
    Walther S; Schuetz GM; Hamm B; Dewey M
    Rofo; 2011 Dec; 183(12):1106-10. PubMed ID: 22144064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Included in Systematic Reviews)].
    Schuetz GM; Tackmann R; Hamm B; Dewey M
    Rofo; 2010 Nov; 182(11):939-42. PubMed ID: 20922647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reprint--preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
    Moher D; Liberati A; Tetzlaff J; Altman DG;
    Phys Ther; 2009 Sep; 89(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 19723669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The PRISMA statement: a guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Swartz MK
    J Pediatr Health Care; 2011; 25(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21147401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scope for improvement in the quality of reporting of systematic reviews. From the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group.
    Shea B; Bouter LM; Grimshaw JM; Francis D; Ortiz Z; Wells GA; Tugwell PS; Boers M
    J Rheumatol; 2006 Jan; 33(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16267878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study.
    Wen J; Ren Y; Wang L; Li Y; Liu Y; Zhou M; Liu P; Ye L; Li Y; Tian W
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):770-5. PubMed ID: 18411041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The EQUATOR Network and the PRISMA Statement for the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Harms M
    Physiotherapy; 2009 Dec; 95(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 19892087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Qualitative methods: systematic reviews in qualitative health-care research as a basis for evidence-based practice].
    Hasseler M
    Gesundheitswesen; 2007 May; 69(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17582547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an illustrated, step-by-step guide.
    Pai M; McCulloch M; Gorman JD; Pai N; Enanoria W; Kennedy G; Tharyan P; Colford JM
    Natl Med J India; 2004; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 15141602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CONSORT and QUOROM guidelines for reporting randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews.
    Turpin DL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):681-5; discussion 686. PubMed ID: 16360902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Randomized trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses: basic criteria in the world of scientific evidence].
    Purgato M; Cipriani A; Barbui C
    Riv Psichiatr; 2012; 47(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 22358214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.
    Finckh A; Tramèr MR
    Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2008 Mar; 4(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 18227829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.
    Leibovici L; Reeves D
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2005 Nov; 56(5):803-4. PubMed ID: 16166177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Montori VM; Swiontkowski MF; Cook DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):43-54. PubMed ID: 12897595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence-based reviews and meta-analysis.
    Evans J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 May; 149(5):701-3. PubMed ID: 20399923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
    Tseng TY; Dahm P; Poolman RW; Preminger GM; Canales BJ; Montori VM
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1249-56. PubMed ID: 18707741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration.
    Welch V; Petticrew M; Petkovic J; Moher D; Waters E; White H; Tugwell P;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():68-89. PubMed ID: 26348799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.