These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22144552)

  • 41. Ionizing radiation. The question of responsible use: Pandora's box revisited.
    Soares DP; Gilligan P
    West Indian Med J; 2004 Mar; 53(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 15199724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A study of general practitioners' knowledge of ionizing radiation from diagnostic imaging examinations.
    Kada S
    Qual Prim Care; 2010; 18(6):391-7. PubMed ID: 21294981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. High-dose fluoroscopy: the administrator's responsibilities.
    Archer BR
    Radiol Manage; 2002; 24(2):26-32; quiz 33-5. PubMed ID: 11962073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Prudent use of computed tomography for the improvement of patient safety].
    Kaplan O; Blank A
    Harefuah; 2011 Jun; 150(6):528-31, 551. PubMed ID: 21800493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Radiation protection in pediatric imaging.
    Furlow B
    Radiol Technol; 2011; 82(5):421-39. PubMed ID: 21572064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Should we obtain informed consent for examinations that expose patients to radiation?
    Nievelstein RA; Frush DP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Sep; 199(3):664-9. PubMed ID: 22915409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. More on the risks associated with radiation.
    Cohen MD
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Jun; 6(6):463. PubMed ID: 19467498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. What all physicians should know about the potential radiation risk that computed tomography poses for paediatric patients.
    Sodhi KS; Lee EY
    Acta Paediatr; 2014 Aug; 103(8):807-11. PubMed ID: 24673144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Computerized tomography. Understanding the risks and benefits.
    Mayo Clin Womens Healthsource; 2010 Sep; 14(9):1-2. PubMed ID: 20736898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Awareness of radiation exposure of thoracic CT scans and conventional radiographs: what do non-radiologists know?].
    Heyer CM; Peters S; Lemburg S; Nicolas V
    Rofo; 2007 Mar; 179(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 17262242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Medical exposure of the population from diagnostic use of ionizing radiation in luxembourg between 1994 and 2002.
    Shannoun F; Zeeb H; Back C; Blettner M
    Health Phys; 2006 Aug; 91(2):154-62. PubMed ID: 16832196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Communication of benefits and risks of medical radiation: a historical perspective.
    Timins JK
    Health Phys; 2011 Nov; 101(5):562-5. PubMed ID: 21979541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The Role of the Medical Physicist in Managing Radiation Dose and Communicating Risk in CT.
    McCollough CH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jun; 206(6):1241-4. PubMed ID: 27043790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The awareness of caregivers about their children's exposure to ionizing radiation accompanying medical procedures: the assessment study.
    Jończyk-Potoczna K; Pucher B; Strzelczuk-Judka L; Buraczyńska-Andrzejewska B; Więckowska B; Krauss H; Biliński P; Wojtyła-Buciora P
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2019 Feb; 32(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 30679876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Potential radiation hazard in nuclear medicine].
    Guilabert N; Ricard M; Chamoulaud K; Mazelier C; Schlumberger M
    Rev Prat; 2015 Jan; 65(1):83-4. PubMed ID: 25842441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Diagnostic imaging: radiation dose and patients' concerns.
    Lockwood D; Einstein D; Davros W
    Cleve Clin J Med; 2006 Jun; 73(6):583-6. PubMed ID: 16784159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A survey of awareness of radiation dose among health professionals in Northern Ireland.
    Soye JA; Paterson A
    Br J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 81(969):725-9. PubMed ID: 18591196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Radiation dose in cardiac imaging: how should it affect clinical decisions?
    Shapiro BP; Mergo PJ; Snipelisky DF; Kantor B; Gerber TC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):508-14. PubMed ID: 23436838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Science and perception of radiation risk.
    Broadbent MV; Hubbard LB
    Radiographics; 1992 Mar; 12(2):381-92. PubMed ID: 1561427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Suboptimal awareness of radiologic dose among patients undergoing cardiac stress scintigraphy.
    Bedetti G; Pizzi C; Gavaruzzi G; Lugaresi F; Cicognani A; Picano E
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Feb; 5(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 18242529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.