These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22145778)

  • 1. Microscopic examination of bone marrow aspirate in healthy adults - comparison of two techniques of slide preparation.
    Lewandowski K; Kowalik MM; Pawlaczyk R; Rogowski J; Hellmann A
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2012 Jun; 34(3):254-61. PubMed ID: 22145778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ICSH guidelines for the standardization of bone marrow specimens and reports.
    Lee SH; Erber WN; Porwit A; Tomonaga M; Peterson LC;
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2008 Oct; 30(5):349-64. PubMed ID: 18822060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automation of bone marrow aspirate examination using the XE-2100 automated hematology analyzer.
    Mori Y; Mizukami T; Hamaguchi Y; Tsuruda K; Yamada Y; Kamihira S
    Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2004 Mar; 58(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 14994372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated hematologic analysis of bone marrow aspirate samples from healthy Beagle dogs.
    Tan E; Abrams-Ogg AC; Defarges A; Bienzle D
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2014 Sep; 43(3):342-51. PubMed ID: 25135758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Normalization of bone marrow aspirates for hemodilution in flow cytometric analyses.
    Loken MR; Chu SC; Fritschle W; Kalnoski M; Wells DA
    Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2009 Jan; 76(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 18548614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cellularity of bone marrow--a comparison of trephine biopsies and aspirate smears.
    Paul M; Chandy M; Pulimood R; Krishnaswami H
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 1989 Jul; 32(3):186-9. PubMed ID: 2674007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of an automated hematology analyzer and flow cytometry to assess bone marrow cellularity and differential cell count.
    Kim M; Kim J; Lim J; Kim Y; Han K; Kang CS
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2004; 34(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 15487705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of two techniques of preparing bone marrow aspirate slides.
    Aleem A; Alsaleh K; Aljabry M; Aziz S; Iqbal Z; Almomen A
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2016 May; 66(5):528-7. PubMed ID: 27183929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flow cytometric assessment of peripheral blood contamination and proliferative activity of human bone marrow cell populations.
    Abrahamsen JF; Lund-Johansen F; Laerum OD; Schem BC; Sletvold O; Smaaland R
    Cytometry; 1995 Jan; 19(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 7705188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microscopic examination of bone marrow aspirates in malignant disorders of haematopoiesis--a comparison of two slide preparation techniques.
    Lewandowski K; Complak A; Hellmann A
    Ann Hematol; 2012 Apr; 91(4):497-505. PubMed ID: 21989736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A method for quantification of peripheral blood admixture in bone marrow aspirates.
    Holdrinet RS; von Egmond J; Wessels JM; Haanen C
    Exp Hematol; 1980 Jan; 8(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 7409031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determination of the number of mast cells in lymph node, bone marrow, and buffy coat cytologic specimens from dogs.
    Bookbinder PF; Butt MT; Harvey HJ
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1992 Jun; 200(11):1648-50. PubMed ID: 1624339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bone marrow examination: techniques and interpretation.
    Hyun BH; Gulati GL; Ashton JK
    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1988 Dec; 2(4):513-23. PubMed ID: 3065315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bone marrow aspiration before bone marrow core biopsy using the same bone marrow biopsy needle: a good or bad practice?
    Islam A
    J Clin Pathol; 2007 Feb; 60(2):212-5. PubMed ID: 16751305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peripheral blood admixture in bone marrow aspirates.
    Vladimirskaya EB
    Folia Haematol Int Mag Klin Morphol Blutforsch; 1987; 114(4):542-8. PubMed ID: 2446995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bone marrow evaluation: the relative merits of particle sections and smear preparations.
    Cetto GL; Iannucci A; Perini A; Capitanio A; Alloush N; Fiore-Donati L
    Appl Pathol; 1983; 1(4):181-93. PubMed ID: 6432009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Cytologic detection of neuroblasts in the bone marrow].
    Bayle C
    Bull Cancer; 1988; 75(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 3282576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of bone marrow aspirate particle smears, imprints and biopsy sections.
    Sabharwal BD; Malhotra V; Aruna S; Grewal R
    J Postgrad Med; 1990 Oct; 36(4):194-8. PubMed ID: 2132243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fluorescence in situ hybridization reveals closely correlated results in cytological and histological specimens of hematological neoplasias compared to conventional cytogenetics.
    Gerr H; Gadzicki D; Kreipe H; Schlegelberger B; Wilkens L
    Pathobiology; 2006; 73(6):271-9. PubMed ID: 17374964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving the quality of bone marrow assessment: Impact of operator techniques and use of a specimen preparation checklist.
    Odejide OO; Cronin AM; DeAngelo DJ; Bernazzoli ZA; Jacobson JO; Rodig SJ; LaCasce AS; Mazeika TJ; Earles KD; Abel GA
    Cancer; 2013 Oct; 119(19):3472-8. PubMed ID: 23921812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.