These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Comparison of the ECST, CC, and NASCET grading methods and ultrasound for assessing carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trial. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Staikov IN; Arnold M; Mattle HP; Remonda L; Sturzenegger M; Baumgartner RW; Schroth G J Neurol; 2000 Sep; 247(9):681-6. PubMed ID: 11081806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of atherosclerotic internal carotid stenosis as the noninvasive imaging modality in revascularization decision making. Cosottini M; Pingitore A; Puglioli M; Michelassi MC; Lupi G; Abbruzzese A; Calabrese R; Lombardi M; Parenti G; Bartolozzi C Stroke; 2003 Mar; 34(3):660-4. PubMed ID: 12624288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography? Vanninen RL; Manninen HI; Partanen PK; Tulla H; Vainio PA Neuroradiology; 1996 May; 38(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 8738083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography with high-resolution black blood cardiovascular magnetic resonance for assessing carotid artery stenosis. Babiarz LS; Astor B; Mohamed MA; Wasserman BA J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 17178682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison between NASCET and ECST methods in the study of carotids: evaluation using Multi-Detector-Row CT angiography. Saba L; Mallarini G Eur J Radiol; 2010 Oct; 76(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 19464837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of carotid atherosclerotic disease using three-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Wang Z; Lu M; Liu W; Zheng T; Li D; Yu W; Fan Z J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2020 Mar; 22(1):18. PubMed ID: 32131854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Further comments on the measurement of carotid stenosis from angiograms. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group. Eliasziw M; Smith RF; Singh N; Holdsworth DW; Fox AJ; Barnett HJ Stroke; 1994 Dec; 25(12):2445-9. PubMed ID: 7974588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computed tomography angiography-derived area stenosis calculations overestimate degree of carotid stenosis compared with North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial-derived diameter stenosis calculations. Arous EJ; Judelson DR; Agrawal A; Dundamadappa SK; Crawford AS; Malka KT; Simons JP; Schanzer A J Vasc Surg; 2021 Aug; 74(2):579-585.e2. PubMed ID: 33548432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional T2-weighted MRI of the human femoral arterial vessel wall at 3.0 Tesla. Zhang Z; Fan Z; Carroll TJ; Chung Y; Weale P; Jerecic R; Li D Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):619-26. PubMed ID: 19692844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standard duplex criteria overestimate the degree of stenosis after eversion carotid endarterectomy. Benzing T; Wilhoit C; Wright S; McCann PA; Lessner S; Brothers TE J Vasc Surg; 2015 Jun; 61(6):1457-63. PubMed ID: 25758452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variability in measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis by arch angiography and duplex ultrasonography--time for a reappraisal? Griffiths GD; Razzaq R; Farrell A; Ashleigh R; Charlesworth D Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2001 Feb; 21(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 11237785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography. Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of the angiographic internal carotid artery stenosis assessment method on indicating carotid surgery. Müller M; Bartylla K; Rolshausen A; Piepgras U; Schimrigk K Vasa; 1998 Feb; 27(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 9540429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MRI of the lumbar spine: comparison of 3D isotropic turbo spin-echo SPACE sequence versus conventional 2D sequences at 3.0 T. Lee S; Jee WH; Jung JY; Lee SY; Ryu KS; Ha KY Acta Radiol; 2015 Feb; 56(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 24553584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]