BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22147776)

  • 1. Improving detection of adolescent hearing loss.
    Sekhar DL; Rhoades JA; Longenecker AL; Beiler JS; King TS; Widome MD; Paul IM
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2011 Dec; 165(12):1094-100. PubMed ID: 22147776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of audiometric screening criteria for the identification of noise-induced hearing loss in adolescents.
    Meinke DK; Dice N
    Am J Audiol; 2007 Dec; 16(2):S190-202. PubMed ID: 18056872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficient hearing screening in noise-exposed listeners using the digit triplet test.
    Jansen S; Luts H; Dejonckere P; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):773-8. PubMed ID: 23782715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Slight-mild sensorineural hearing loss in children: audiometric, clinical, and risk factor profiles.
    Cone BK; Wake M; Tobin S; Poulakis Z; Rickards FW
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):202-12. PubMed ID: 20054279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pilot study of a high-frequency school-based hearing screen to detect adolescent hearing loss.
    Sekhar DL; Zalewski TR; Ghossaini SN; King TS; Rhoades JA; Czarnecki B; Grounds S; Deese B; Barr AL; Paul IM
    J Med Screen; 2014 Mar; 21(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 24523012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A multicenter study on the audiometric findings of styrene-exposed workers.
    Morata TC; Sliwinska-Kowalska M; Johnson AC; Starck J; Pawlas K; Zamyslowska-Szmytke E; Nylen P; Toppila E; Krieg E; Pawlas N; Prasher D
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Oct; 50(10):652-60. PubMed ID: 21812635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pure-tone threshold description of an elderly French screened population.
    Blanchet C; Pommie C; Mondain M; Berr C; Hillaire D; Puel JL
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jun; 29(4):432-40. PubMed ID: 18520580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Results from high-frequency hearing screening in 14- to 15-year old adolescents and their relation to self-reported exposure to loud music.
    Weichbold V; Holzer A; Newesely G; Stephan K
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):650-4. PubMed ID: 22571517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prevalence of noise-induced hearing loss in student musicians.
    Phillips SL; Henrich VC; Mace ST
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Apr; 49(4):309-16. PubMed ID: 20233141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prevalence of hearing disorders in Singapore military conscripts: a role for routine audiometry screening?
    Toh ST; Lu P; Ong M; Seet B
    Singapore Med J; 2002 Dec; 43(12):622-7. PubMed ID: 12693766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of recreational noise exposure on hearing impairment among teenage students.
    Tung CY; Chao KP
    Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Jan; 34(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 22940166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Hearing the impact of MP3 on a survey of middle school students].
    Xu Z; Li Z; Chen Y; He Y; Chunyu X; Wang F; Zhang P; Gao L; Qiu S; Liu S; Qiao L; Qiu J
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 25(4):151-3. PubMed ID: 21563460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Hearing disability in relation to audiometric threshold values: hypothesis on the determination of the onset of hearing loss].
    Albera R; Beatrice F; Romano C; Coggiola M; Bosia S; Vergnano P; Luccoli L; Schindler A; Argentero P
    Med Lav; 2002; 93(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 11987497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hearing loss among Ohio farm youth: a comparison to a national sample.
    Renick KM; Crawford JM; Wilkins JR
    Am J Ind Med; 2009 Mar; 52(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 19089836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of cortical evoked response audiometry in the assessment of noise-induced hearing loss.
    Hone SW; Norman G; Keogh I; Kelly V
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2003 Feb; 128(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 12601323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hearing in nonprofessional pop/rock musicians.
    Schmuziger N; Patscheke J; Probst R
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 16825883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity of self-rated hearing compared with audiometric measurement among construction workers.
    Hong O; Ronis DL; Antonakos CL
    Nurs Res; 2011; 60(5):326-32. PubMed ID: 21873915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High frequency audiometric notch: an outpatient clinic survey.
    Osei-Lah V; Yeoh LH
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Feb; 49(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 20151883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.