These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22147927)

  • 1. The monetary value of the man-mSv for Korean NPP radiation workers assessed by the radiation aversion factor.
    Lee BI; Suh DH; Kim SI; Jeong MS; Lim YK
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jul; 150(4):516-9. PubMed ID: 22147927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiation dose distribution for workers in South Korean nuclear power plants.
    Lee BI; Kim SI; Suh DH; Jin YW; Kim JI; Choi H; Lim YK
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jul; 140(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 20223854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A step function model to evaluate the real monetary value of man-sievert with real GDP.
    Na SH; Kim SG
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009; 67(7-8):1307-10. PubMed ID: 19307131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dosimetry experiences and lessons learned for radiation dose assessment in Korean nuclear power plants.
    Choi JR; Kim HG; Kong TY; Son JK
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jul; 155(2):245-9. PubMed ID: 23204558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of annual whole-body occupational radiation exposure in medical practice in Ghana (2000-09).
    Hasford F; Owusu-Banahene J; Amoako JK; Otoo F; Darko EO; Emi-Reynolds G; Yeboah J; Arwui CC; Adu S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 May; 149(4):431-7. PubMed ID: 21743072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An assessment of annual whole-body occupational radiation exposure in Ireland (1996-2005).
    Colgan PA; Currivan L; Fenton D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 17562657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comprehensive dose reconstruction methodology for former rocketdyne/atomics international radiation workers.
    Boice JD; Leggett RW; Ellis ED; Wallace PW; Mumma M; Cohen SS; Brill AB; Chadda B; Boecker BB; Yoder RC; Eckerman KF
    Health Phys; 2006 May; 90(5):409-30. PubMed ID: 16607174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of annual whole-body occupational radiation exposure in education, research and industrial sectors in Ghana (2000-09).
    Hasford F; Owusu-Banahene J; Otoo F; Adu S; Sosu EK; Amoako JK; Darko EO; Emi-Reynolds G; Nani EK; Boadu M; Arwui CC; Yeboah J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jul; 150(3):350-8. PubMed ID: 22021059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of the aversion coefficient in nuclear safety in Hungary.
    Eged K; Kanyár B; Kis Z; Tatay T
    Health Phys; 2002 Jun; 82(6):825-30. PubMed ID: 12046754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation fields and dose assessments in Korean nuclear power plants.
    Kim HG; Kong TY; Jeong WT; Kim ST
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jul; 146(1-3):136-9. PubMed ID: 21498858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selection of the most appropriate two-dosemeter algorithm for estimating effective dose equivalent during maintenance periods in Korean nuclear power plants.
    Kim HG; Kong TY
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jul; 140(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 20203124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimization of radiation protection for the control of occupational exposure in Ghana.
    Gordon SW; Schandorf C; Yeboah J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(3):386-93. PubMed ID: 21163897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of p53 levels in lymphocytes and in blood plasma of nuclear power plant workers.
    Rössner P; Chvatalova I; Schmuczerova J; Milcova A; Rössner P; Sram RJ
    Mutat Res; 2004 Nov; 556(1-2):55-63. PubMed ID: 15491632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Occupational exposure to external ionising radiation in Poland, 1999.
    Koczynski A; Chec A; Lach D; Dabek M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 96(1-3):61-2. PubMed ID: 11586756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The average collective equivalent dose and fatal cancer risk for radiation workers in Radiology Department at Phramongkutklao Hospital, 2004-2008.
    Saengruang-Orn S; Mongkolsuk M; Rangsiphat T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 May; 95 Suppl 5():S96-102. PubMed ID: 22934453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perception of Radiation Risk by Japanese Radiation Specialists Evaluated as a Safe Dose Before the Fukushima Nuclear Accident.
    Miura M; Ono K; Yamauchi M; Matsuda N
    Health Phys; 2016 Jun; 110(6):558-62. PubMed ID: 27115222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of radiation workers' dose records in the Korean National Dose Registry.
    Choi SY; Kim TH; Chung CK; Cho CK; Paik NS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 95(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 11572642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk perception, trust, and factors related to a planned new nuclear power plant in Taiwan after the 2011 Fukushima disaster.
    Ho JC; Kao SF; Wang JD; Su CT; Lee CT; Chen RY; Chang HL; Ieong MC; Chang PW
    J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):773-89. PubMed ID: 24048022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Current status of radiological protection at Swiss NPPS.
    Lips M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jul; 146(1-3):347-50. PubMed ID: 21729944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A study on occupational exposure in a PET/CT facility.
    Vargas Castrillón S; Cutanda Henríquez F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):247-9. PubMed ID: 21733867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.