148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22149855)
1. Toward a better understanding of the gamma index: Investigation of parameters with a surface-based distance method.
Li H; Dong L; Zhang L; Yang JN; Gillin MT; Zhu XR
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6730-41. PubMed ID: 22149855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the insensitivity of single field planar dosimetry to IMRT inaccuracies.
Kruse JJ
Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2516-24. PubMed ID: 20632563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breaking bad IMRT QA practice.
Stojadinovic S; Ouyang L; Gu X; Pompoš A; Bao Q; Solberg TD
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 May; 16(3):5242. PubMed ID: 26103484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative analysis of geometric information from an end-to-end examination of IMRT and VMAT using the optimal selection method.
Tachibana H; Takahashi R
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061709. PubMed ID: 23718588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pretreatment patient-specific IMRT quality assurance: a correlation study between gamma index and patient clinical dose volume histogram.
Stasi M; Bresciani S; Miranti A; Maggio A; Sapino V; Gabriele P
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7626-34. PubMed ID: 23231310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. IMRT QA: Selecting gamma criteria based on error detection sensitivity.
Steers JM; Fraass BA
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1982. PubMed ID: 27036593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tomotherapy treatment plan quality assurance: the impact of applied criteria on passing rate in gamma index method.
Bresciani S; Di Dia A; Maggio A; Cutaia C; Miranti A; Infusino E; Stasi M
Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121711. PubMed ID: 24320497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biological consequences of MLC calibration errors in IMRT delivery and QA.
Moiseenko V; Lapointe V; James K; Yin L; Liu M; Pawlicki T
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1917-24. PubMed ID: 22482613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3DVH software estimates of dose to virtual ion chamber and film in composite IMRT QA.
Olch AJ
Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 22225277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Moving from gamma passing rates to patient DVH-based QA metrics in pretreatment dose QA.
Zhen H; Nelms BE; Tome WA
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5477-89. PubMed ID: 21992366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does the γ dose distribution comparison technique default to the distance to agreement test in clinical dose distributions?
Low DA; Morele D; Chow P; Dou TH; Ju T
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071722. PubMed ID: 23822426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interpretation and evaluation of the gamma index and the gamma index angle for the verification of IMRT hybrid plans.
Stock M; Kroupa B; Georg D
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Feb; 50(3):399-411. PubMed ID: 15773719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the gamma index analysis in various commercial IMRT/VMAT QA systems.
Hussein M; Rowshanfarzad P; Ebert MA; Nisbet A; Clark CH
Radiother Oncol; 2013 Dec; 109(3):370-6. PubMed ID: 24100148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. IMRT planning parameter optimization for spine stereotactic radiosurgery.
Ayala GB; Doan KA; Ko HJ; Park PK; Santiago ED; Kuruvila SJ; Ghia AJ; Briere TM; Wen Z
Med Dosim; 2019 Winter; 44(4):303-308. PubMed ID: 30514600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multi-institution validation of a new high spatial resolution diode array for SRS and SBRT plan pretreatment quality assurance.
Rose MS; Tirpak L; Van Casteren K; Zack J; Simon T; Schoenfeld A; Simon W
Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 47(7):3153-3164. PubMed ID: 32215929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A noise correction of the γ-index method for Monte Carlo dose distribution comparison.
Cohilis M; Sterpin E; Lee JA; Souris K
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):681-692. PubMed ID: 31660623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new metric for assessing IMRT modulation complexity and plan deliverability.
McNiven AL; Sharpe MB; Purdie TG
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):505-15. PubMed ID: 20229859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. IMRT QA and gamma comparisons: The impact of detector geometry, spatial sampling, and delivery technique on gamma comparison sensitivity.
Steers JM; Fraass BA
Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):5367-5381. PubMed ID: 34036596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of DVH-based treatment plan verification in addition to gamma passing rates for head and neck IMRT.
Visser R; Wauben DJ; de Groot M; Steenbakkers RJ; Bijl HP; Godart J; van't Veld AA; Langendijk JA; Korevaar EW
Radiother Oncol; 2014 Sep; 112(3):389-95. PubMed ID: 25154319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental validation of deterministic Acuros XB algorithm for IMRT and VMAT dose calculations with the Radiological Physics Center's head and neck phantom.
Han T; Mourtada F; Kisling K; Mikell J; Followill D; Howell R
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2193-202. PubMed ID: 22482641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
