These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22150194)

  • 1. Making sense of work-based assessment: ask the right questions, in the right way, about the right things, of the right people.
    Crossley J; Jolly B
    Med Educ; 2012 Jan; 46(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 22150194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Good questions, good answers: construct alignment improves the performance of workplace-based assessment scales.
    Crossley J; Johnson G; Booth J; Wade W
    Med Educ; 2011 Jun; 45(6):560-9. PubMed ID: 21501218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Broadening perspectives on clinical performance assessment: rethinking the nature of in-training assessment.
    Govaerts MJ; van der Vleuten CP; Schuwirth LW; Muijtjens AM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2007 May; 12(2):239-60. PubMed ID: 17096207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity in work-based assessment: expanding our horizons.
    Govaerts M; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 2013 Dec; 47(12):1164-74. PubMed ID: 24206150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Programmatic assessment and Kane's validity perspective.
    Schuwirth LW; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 2012 Jan; 46(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 22150195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A history of assessment in medical education.
    Schuwirth LWT; van der Vleuten CPM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2020 Dec; 25(5):1045-1056. PubMed ID: 33113056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conceptualising and classifying validity evidence for simulation.
    Andreatta PB; Gruppen LD
    Med Educ; 2009 Nov; 43(11):1028-35. PubMed ID: 19874494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Entrustability Scales: Outlining Their Usefulness for Competency-Based Clinical Assessment.
    Rekman J; Gofton W; Dudek N; Gofton T; Hamstra SJ
    Acad Med; 2016 Feb; 91(2):186-90. PubMed ID: 26630609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct observation in medical education: a review of the literature and evidence for validity.
    Fromme HB; Karani R; Downing SM
    Mt Sinai J Med; 2009 Aug; 76(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 19642150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Review article: assessment in anesthesiology education.
    Boulet JR; Murray D
    Can J Anaesth; 2012 Feb; 59(2):182-92. PubMed ID: 22139965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A primer on classical test theory and item response theory for assessments in medical education.
    De Champlain AF
    Med Educ; 2010 Jan; 44(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 20078762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].
    Santiago-Delefosse M; Cahen F; Coeffin-Driol C
    Encephale; 2003; 29(4 Pt 1):293-305. PubMed ID: 14615699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring individual opinions of potential evaluators in a 360-degree assessment: four distinct viewpoints of a competent resident.
    Thammasitboon S; Mariscalco MM; Yudkowsky R; Hetland MD; Noronha PA; Mrtek RG
    Teach Learn Med; 2008; 20(4):314-22. PubMed ID: 18855235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of rating scales on scores given to junior doctors in multi-source feedback.
    Hassell A; Bullock A; Whitehouse A; Wood L; Jones P; Wall D
    Postgrad Med J; 2012 Jan; 88(1035):10-4. PubMed ID: 22052883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Realizing the promise and importance of performance-based assessment.
    Kogan JR; Holmboe E
    Teach Learn Med; 2013; 25 Suppl 1():S68-74. PubMed ID: 24246110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating the minimum number of judges required for test-centred standard setting on written assessments. do discussion and iteration have an influence?
    Fowell SL; Fewtrell R; McLaughlin PJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Mar; 13(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 16957872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. From test validity to construct validity … and back?
    Colliver JA; Conlee MJ; Verhulst SJ
    Med Educ; 2012 Apr; 46(4):366-71. PubMed ID: 22429172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do entrustment scales make a difference in the inter-rater reliability of the workplace-based assessment?
    Eltayar AN; Aref SR; Khalifa HM; Hammad AS
    Med Educ Online; 2022 Dec; 27(1):2053401. PubMed ID: 35311494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attention to gender in communication skills assessment instruments in medical education: a review.
    Dielissen P; Bottema B; Verdonk P; Lagro-Janssen T
    Med Educ; 2011 Mar; 45(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 21299599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Workplace-based assessments of junior doctors: do scores predict training difficulties?
    Mitchell C; Bhat S; Herbert A; Baker P
    Med Educ; 2011 Dec; 45(12):1190-8. PubMed ID: 21995509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.