161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22150548)
1. TRM: a powerful two-stage machine learning approach for identifying SNP-SNP interactions.
Lin HY; Chen YA; Tsai YY; Qu X; Tseng TS; Park JY
Ann Hum Genet; 2012 Jan; 76(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 22150548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of multivariate adaptive regression splines and logistic regression in detecting SNP-SNP interactions and their application in prostate cancer.
Lin HY; Wang W; Liu YH; Soong SJ; York TP; Myers L; Hu JJ
J Hum Genet; 2008; 53(9):802-811. PubMed ID: 18607530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genome-wide association data classification and SNPs selection using two-stage quality-based Random Forests.
Nguyen TT; Huang J; Wu Q; Nguyen T; Li M
BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S5. PubMed ID: 25708662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the ability of tree-based methods and logistic regression for the detection of SNP-SNP interaction.
García-Magariños M; López-de-Ullibarri I; Cao R; Salas A
Ann Hum Genet; 2009 May; 73(Pt 3):360-9. PubMed ID: 19291098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Random Forests approach for identifying additive and epistatic single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with residual feed intake in dairy cattle.
Yao C; Spurlock DM; Armentano LE; Page CD; VandeHaar MJ; Bickhart DM; Weigel KA
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Oct; 96(10):6716-29. PubMed ID: 23932129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the performance of decision tree (DT) algorithms and extreme learning machine (ELM) model in the prediction of water quality of the Upper Green River watershed.
Anmala J; Turuganti V
Water Environ Res; 2021 Nov; 93(11):2360-2373. PubMed ID: 34528328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. SNP-SNP interaction network in angiogenesis genes associated with prostate cancer aggressiveness.
Lin HY; Amankwah EK; Tseng TS; Qu X; Chen DT; Park JY
PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e59688. PubMed ID: 23593148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening Discriminating SNPs for Chinese Indigenous Pig Breeds Identification Using a Random Forests Algorithm.
Gao J; Sun L; Zhang S; Xu J; He M; Zhang D; Wu C; Dai J
Genes (Basel); 2022 Nov; 13(12):. PubMed ID: 36553474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bootstrap aggregating of alternating decision trees to detect sets of SNPs that associate with disease.
Guy RT; Santago P; Langefeld CD
Genet Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 36(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 22851473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modeling X Chromosome Data Using Random Forests: Conquering Sex Bias.
Winham SJ; Jenkins GD; Biernacka JM
Genet Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 26639183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single Nucleotide Polymorphism relevance learning with Random Forests for Type 2 diabetes risk prediction.
López B; Torrent-Fontbona F; Viñas R; Fernández-Real JM
Artif Intell Med; 2018 Apr; 85():43-49. PubMed ID: 28943335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A machine learning approach for the identification of population-informative markers from high-throughput genotyping data: application to several pig breeds.
Schiavo G; Bertolini F; Galimberti G; Bovo S; Dall'Olio S; Nanni Costa L; Gallo M; Fontanesi L
Animal; 2020 Feb; 14(2):223-232. PubMed ID: 31603060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Machine learning approach to single nucleotide polymorphism-based asthma prediction.
Gaudillo J; Rodriguez JJR; Nazareno A; Baltazar LR; Vilela J; Bulalacao R; Domingo M; Albia J
PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0225574. PubMed ID: 31800601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Machine Learning to Identify Interaction of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms as a Risk Factor for Chronic Drug-Induced Liver Injury.
Moore R; Ashby K; Liao TJ; Chen M
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(20):. PubMed ID: 34682349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Revealing third-order interactions through the integration of machine learning and entropy methods in genomic studies.
Yaldız B; Erdoğan O; Rafatov S; Iyigün C; Aydın Son Y
BioData Min; 2024 Jan; 17(1):3. PubMed ID: 38291454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SNP selection and classification of genome-wide SNP data using stratified sampling random forests.
Wu Q; Ye Y; Liu Y; Ng MK
IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2012 Sep; 11(3):216-27. PubMed ID: 22987127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. SNP interaction detection with Random Forests in high-dimensional genetic data.
Winham SJ; Colby CL; Freimuth RR; Wang X; de Andrade M; Huebner M; Biernacka JM
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jul; 13():164. PubMed ID: 22793366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genomic Prediction of Breeding Values Using a Subset of SNPs Identified by Three Machine Learning Methods.
Li B; Zhang N; Wang YG; George AW; Reverter A; Li Y
Front Genet; 2018; 9():237. PubMed ID: 30023001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Machine Learning as an Effective Method for Identifying True Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Polyploid Plants.
Korani W; Clevenger JP; Chu Y; Ozias-Akins P
Plant Genome; 2019 Mar; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 30951095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Supervised learning-based tagSNP selection for genome-wide disease classifications.
Liu Q; Yang J; Chen Z; Yang MQ; Sung AH; Huang X
BMC Genomics; 2008; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S6. PubMed ID: 18366619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
