111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22151986)
21. How to transition to digital mammography.
Zuley M
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Mar; 4(3):178-83. PubMed ID: 17412259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Efficacy of storage phosphor-based digital mammography in diagnosis of breast cancer--comparison with film-screen mammography].
Kitahama H
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 May; 51(5):547-60. PubMed ID: 1651472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Image quality of digital direct flat-panel mammography versus an analog screen-film technique using a low-contrast phantom.
Krug KB; Stützer H; Schröder R; Boecker J; Poggenborg J; Lackner K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Sep; 191(3):W80-8. PubMed ID: 18716083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Visualization of microcalcifications on mammographies obtained by digital full-field mammography in comparison to conventional film-screen mammography].
Diekmann S; Bick U; von Heyden H; Diekmann F
Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):775-9. PubMed ID: 12811689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Digital mammography.
D'Orsi CJ
Curr Womens Health Rep; 2002 Apr; 2(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 12116601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Clinical results of digital mammography].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Bautz W
Radiologe; 2005 Mar; 45(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 15744483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic accuracy of Fischer Senoscan Digital Mammography versus screen-film mammography in a diagnostic mammography population.
Cole E; Pisano ED; Brown M; Kuzmiak C; Braeuning MP; Kim HH; Jong R; Walsh R
Acad Radiol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):879-86. PubMed ID: 15288038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with conventional screen film system (SFS), digital phosphor storage plate in/without magnification technique (CR) and digital CCD-technique (CCD).
Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Säbel M; Böhner C; Dobritz M; Wenkel E; Bautz W
Rontgenpraxis; 2001; 54(4):123-6. PubMed ID: 11883115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.
Pisano ED; Gatsonis C; Hendrick E; Yaffe M; Baum JK; Acharyya S; Conant EF; Fajardo LL; Bassett L; D'Orsi C; Jong R; Rebner M;
N Engl J Med; 2005 Oct; 353(17):1773-83. PubMed ID: 16169887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of transition to digital mammography on clinical outcomes.
Glynn CG; Farria DM; Monsees BS; Salcman JT; Wiele KN; Hildebolt CF
Radiology; 2011 Sep; 260(3):664-70. PubMed ID: 21788529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program.
Hambly NM; McNicholas MM; Phelan N; Hargaden GC; O'Doherty A; Flanagan FL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1010-8. PubMed ID: 19770323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cost and cost-effectiveness of digital mammography compared with film-screen mammography in Australia.
Wang S; Merlin T; Kreisz F; Craft P; Hiller JE
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2009 Oct; 33(5):430-6. PubMed ID: 19811478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of calcification specificity in digital mammography using soft-copy display versus screen-film mammography.
Kim HH; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Jiroutek MR; Muller KE; Zheng Y; Kuzmiak CM; Koomen MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jul; 187(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 16794154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Use of digital mammography in needle localization procedures.
Dershaw DD; Fleischman RC; Liberman L; Deutch B; Abramson AF; Hann L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Sep; 161(3):559-62. PubMed ID: 8352104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The basics and implementation of digital mammography.
Zuley ML
Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):893-901. PubMed ID: 20868892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quantitative assessment of percent breast density: analog versus digital acquisition.
Harvey JA
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Dec; 3(6):611-6. PubMed ID: 15560719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Implementing digital quality control in a breast center.
Parikh J; Fanus D
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Nov; 1(11):854-60. PubMed ID: 17411717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography on interval cancer characteristics and treatment - a population based study from the Netherlands.
Nederend J; Duijm LE; Louwman MW; Coebergh JW; Roumen RM; Lohle PN; Roukema JA; Rutten MJ; van Steenbergen LN; Ernst MF; Jansen FH; Plaisier ML; Hooijen MJ; Voogd AC
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 24275518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Status of mammography after the Digital Mammography Imaging Screening Trial: digital versus film.
Dershaw DD
Breast J; 2006; 12(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 16509833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [ROC analysis of image quality in digital luminescence radiography in comparison with current film-screen systems in mammography].
Wiebringhaus R; John V; Müller RD; Hirche H; Voss M; Callies R
Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Jul; 5(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 7548257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
