These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22151986)

  • 41. A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Michell MJ; Iqbal A; Wasan RK; Evans DR; Peacock C; Lawinski CP; Douiri A; Wilson R; Whelehan P
    Clin Radiol; 2012 Oct; 67(10):976-81. PubMed ID: 22625656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. The International Digital Mammography Development Group.
    Pisano ED; Cole EB; Major S; Zong S; Hemminger BM; Muller KE; Johnston RE; Walsh R; Conant E; Fajardo LL; Feig SA; Nishikawa RM; Yaffe MJ; Williams MB; Aylward SR
    Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):820-30. PubMed ID: 10966717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A comparison of digital and screen-film mammography using quality control phantoms.
    Undrill PE; O'Kane AD; Gilbert FJ
    Clin Radiol; 2000 Oct; 55(10):782-90. PubMed ID: 11052880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Breast imaging: a comparison of digital luminescence radiographs displayed on TV-monitor and film-screen mammography.
    Jarlman O; Borg A; Braw M; Kehler M; Lyttkens K; Samuelsson L
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1994; 18(5):375-81. PubMed ID: 7812984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Breast cancer: missed interval and screening-detected cancer at full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography-- results from a retrospective review.
    Hoff SR; Abrahamsen AL; Samset JH; Vigeland E; Klepp O; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2012 Aug; 264(2):378-86. PubMed ID: 22700555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations.
    Lewin JM; Hendrick RE; D'Orsi CJ; Isaacs PK; Moss LJ; Karellas A; Sisney GA; Kuni CC; Cutter GR
    Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):873-80. PubMed ID: 11230669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Digital mammography: a review of technical development and clinical applications.
    Shah AJ; Wang J; Yamada T; Fajardo LL
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2003 Apr; 4(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12744760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Two-modality mammography may confer an advantage over either full-field digital mammography or screen-film mammography.
    Glueck DH; Lamb MM; Lewin JM; Pisano ED
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):670-6. PubMed ID: 17502256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Full-field digital mammographic interpretation with prior analog versus prior digitized analog mammography: time for interpretation.
    Garg AS; Rapelyea JA; Rechtman LR; Torrente J; Bittner RB; Coffey CM; Brem RF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):1436-8. PubMed ID: 21606310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Digital mammography screening: average glandular dose and first performance parameters.
    Weigel S; Girnus R; Czwoydzinski J; Decker T; Spital S; Heindel W
    Rofo; 2007 Sep; 179(9):892-5. PubMed ID: 17705112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Breast CT.
    Glick SJ
    Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2007; 9():501-26. PubMed ID: 17506654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Digital and screen-film mammography: comparison of image acquisition and interpretation times.
    Berns EA; Hendrick RE; Solari M; Barke L; Reddy D; Wolfman J; Segal L; DeLeon P; Benjamin S; Willis L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jul; 187(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 16794152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Digital mammography: are there advantages in screening for breast cancer?
    Nees AV
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Apr; 15(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 18342763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography: image quality and lesion detection.
    Fischmann A; Siegmann KC; Wersebe A; Claussen CD; Müller-Schimpfle M
    Br J Radiol; 2005 Apr; 78(928):312-5. PubMed ID: 15774591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Is the upgrade rate of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by core needle biopsy of calcifications different for digital and film-screen mammography?
    McLaughlin CT; Neal CH; Helvie MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):917-22. PubMed ID: 25247961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography.
    Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1205-30. PubMed ID: 7480666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.
    Friedewald SM; Rafferty EA; Rose SL; Durand MA; Plecha DM; Greenberg JS; Hayes MK; Copit DS; Carlson KL; Cink TM; Barke LD; Greer LN; Miller DP; Conant EF
    JAMA; 2014 Jun; 311(24):2499-507. PubMed ID: 25058084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Use of prior mammograms in the transition to digital mammography: a performance and cost analysis.
    Taylor-Phillips S; Wallis MG; Duncan A; Gale AG
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jan; 81(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 21095083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Conventional versus digital mammography in the analysis of screen-detected lesions with low positive predictive value.
    Bonardi R; Ambrogetti D; Ciatto S; Gentile E; Lazzari B; Mantellini P; Nannelli E; Ristori E; Sottani L; Turco MR
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Aug; 55(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 16036157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Low energy mammogram obtained in contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is comparable to routine full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
    Francescone MA; Jochelson MS; Dershaw DD; Sung JS; Hughes MC; Zheng J; Moskowitz C; Morris EA
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1350-5. PubMed ID: 24932846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.