158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22152004)
1. Changes in transcriptional orientation are associated with increases in evolutionary rates of enterobacterial genes.
Lin CH; Lian CY; Hsiung CA; Chen FC
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Oct; 12 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S19. PubMed ID: 22152004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Molecular evolution of the Bovini tribe (Bovidae, Bovinae): is there evidence of rapid evolution or reduced selective constraint in Domestic cattle?
MacEachern S; McEwan J; McCulloch A; Mather A; Savin K; Goddard M
BMC Genomics; 2009 Apr; 10():179. PubMed ID: 19393048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The roles of positive and negative selection in the molecular evolution of insect endosymbionts.
Fry AJ; Wernegreen JJ
Gene; 2005 Aug; 355():1-10. PubMed ID: 16039807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chromosomal location and evolutionary rate variation in enterobacterial genes.
Sharp PM; Shields DC; Wolfe KH; Li WH
Science; 1989 Nov; 246(4931):808-10. PubMed ID: 2683084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The rate of synonymous substitution in enterobacterial genes is inversely related to codon usage bias.
Sharp PM; Li WH
Mol Biol Evol; 1987 May; 4(3):222-30. PubMed ID: 3328816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Synonymous substitution rates in enterobacteria.
Eyre-Walker A; Bulmer M
Genetics; 1995 Aug; 140(4):1407-12. PubMed ID: 7498779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Increased Mutation Rate Is Linked to Genome Reduction in Prokaryotes.
Bourguignon T; Kinjo Y; Villa-MartÃn P; Coleman NV; Tang Q; Arab DA; Wang Z; Tokuda G; Hongoh Y; Ohkuma M; Ho SYW; Pigolotti S; Lo N
Curr Biol; 2020 Oct; 30(19):3848-3855.e4. PubMed ID: 32763167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The rate of adaptive evolution in enteric bacteria.
Charlesworth J; Eyre-Walker A
Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Jul; 23(7):1348-56. PubMed ID: 16621913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complete genome sequence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2.
McClelland M; Sanderson KE; Spieth J; Clifton SW; Latreille P; Courtney L; Porwollik S; Ali J; Dante M; Du F; Hou S; Layman D; Leonard S; Nguyen C; Scott K; Holmes A; Grewal N; Mulvaney E; Ryan E; Sun H; Florea L; Miller W; Stoneking T; Nhan M; Waterston R; Wilson RK
Nature; 2001 Oct; 413(6858):852-6. PubMed ID: 11677609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Synonymous substitutions are clustered in enterobacterial genes.
Eyre-Walker A
J Mol Evol; 1994 Nov; 39(5):448-51. PubMed ID: 7807534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Functional bias of positively selected genes in Streptococcus genomes.
Suzuki H; Stanhope MJ
Infect Genet Evol; 2012 Mar; 12(2):274-7. PubMed ID: 22155358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Location of Substitutions and Bacterial Genome Arrangements.
Lato DF; Golding GB
Genome Biol Evol; 2021 Jan; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 33320172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparisons of dN/dS are time dependent for closely related bacterial genomes.
Rocha EP; Smith JM; Hurst LD; Holden MT; Cooper JE; Smith NH; Feil EJ
J Theor Biol; 2006 Mar; 239(2):226-35. PubMed ID: 16239014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Primary structure of the chromosomal origins (oriC) of Enterobacter aerogenes and Klebsiella pneumoniae: comparisons and evolutionary relationships.
Cleary JM; Smith DW; Harding NE; Zyskind JW
J Bacteriol; 1982 Jun; 150(3):1467-71. PubMed ID: 7042695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genome alignment, evolution of prokaryotic genome organization, and prediction of gene function using genomic context.
Wolf YI; Rogozin IB; Kondrashov AS; Koonin EV
Genome Res; 2001 Mar; 11(3):356-72. PubMed ID: 11230160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Antisense transcription is pervasive but rarely conserved in enteric bacteria.
Raghavan R; Sloan DB; Ochman H
mBio; 2012; 3(4):. PubMed ID: 22872780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Slow but not low: genomic comparisons reveal slower evolutionary rate and higher dN/dS in conifers compared to angiosperms.
Buschiazzo E; Ritland C; Bohlmann J; Ritland K
BMC Evol Biol; 2012 Jan; 12():8. PubMed ID: 22264329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Synonymous substitution-rate constants in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium and their relationship to gene expression and selection pressure.
Berg OG; Martelius M
J Mol Evol; 1995 Oct; 41(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 7563132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differential regulation of multiple proteins of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium by the transcriptional regulator SlyA.
Spory A; Bosserhoff A; von Rhein C; Goebel W; Ludwig A
J Bacteriol; 2002 Jul; 184(13):3549-59. PubMed ID: 12057949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. No gene-specific optimization of mutation rate in Escherichia coli.
Chen X; Zhang J
Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Jul; 30(7):1559-62. PubMed ID: 23533222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]