135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22153174)
1. 2008 Niday Perinatal Database quality audit: report of a quality assurance project.
Dunn S; Bottomley J; Ali A; Walker M
Chronic Dis Inj Can; 2011 Dec; 32(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 22153174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are unaudited records from an outcomes registry database accurate?
Herbert MA; Prince SL; Williams JL; Magee MJ; Mack MJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 77(6):1960-4; discussion 1964-5. PubMed ID: 15172246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
Shiloach M; Frencher SK; Steeger JE; Rowell KS; Bartzokis K; Tomeh MG; Richards KE; Ko CY; Hall BL
J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Jan; 210(1):6-16. PubMed ID: 20123325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Methodology to improve data quality from chart review in the managed care setting.
Cassidy LD; Marsh GM; Holleran MK; Ruhl LS
Am J Manag Care; 2002 Sep; 8(9):787-93. PubMed ID: 12234019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Data quality in the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-Stroke): results from a national data validation audit.
Xian Y; Fonarow GC; Reeves MJ; Webb LE; Blevins J; Demyanenko VS; Zhao X; Olson DM; Hernandez AF; Peterson ED; Schwamm LH; Smith EE
Am Heart J; 2012 Mar; 163(3):392-8, 398.e1. PubMed ID: 22424009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ensuring high accuracy of data abstracted from patient charts: the use of a standardized medical record as a training tool.
Pan L; Fergusson D; Schweitzer I; Hebert PC
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):918-23. PubMed ID: 16085195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Provincial Transfer Authorization Centre database: a comprehensive database containing records of all inter-facility patient transfers in the province of Ontario.
Robinson VA; MacDonald RD; Manuel D; Goel V
BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Oct; 6():129. PubMed ID: 17026763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Data accuracy in the Ontario birth Registry: a chart re-abstraction study.
Dunn S; Lanes A; Sprague AE; Fell DB; Weiss D; Reszel J; Taljaard M; Darling EK; Graham ID; Grimshaw JM; Harrold J; Smith GN; Peterson W; Walker M
BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Dec; 19(1):1001. PubMed ID: 31881960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Task-independent metrics to assess the data quality of medical registries using the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) Database.
Salati M; Brunelli A; Dahan M; Rocco G; Van Raemdonck DE; Varela G;
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 21168341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An attempt at data verification in the EACTS Congenital Database.
Maruszewski B; Lacour-Gayet F; Monro JL; Keogh BE; Tobota Z; Kansy A
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Sep; 28(3):400-4; discussion 405-6. PubMed ID: 16054826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methodological processes in validating and analysing the quality of population-based data: a case study using the Victorian Perinatal Data Collection.
Davey MA; Sloan ML; Palma S; Riley M; King J
Health Inf Manag; 2013; 42(3):12-9. PubMed ID: 24067237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [IT systems for clinical databases--status and perspectives].
Vingtoft S; Jensen LP; Madsen I; Nielsen PH; Kverneland A; Kjaergaard J
Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Sep; 164(38):4398-405. PubMed ID: 12362730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the accuracy of data entry in a regional colorectal cancer database: implications for national audit.
Kelly M; Lamah M
Colorectal Dis; 2007 May; 9(4):337-9. PubMed ID: 17432986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A database of exposures in the rubber manufacturing industry: design and quality control.
De Vocht F; Straif K; Szeszenia-Dabrowska N; Hagmar L; Sorahan T; Burstyn I; Vermeulen R; Kromhout H
Ann Occup Hyg; 2005 Nov; 49(8):691-701. PubMed ID: 16126766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of staging, prognosis, and comorbidity data collection in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) multicenter outcomes database.
Kho ME; Lepisto EM; Niland JC; Friedberg JW; Lacasce AS; Weeks JC
Cancer; 2008 Dec; 113(11):3209-12. PubMed ID: 18855918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a medical record abstraction study on transition of care after childhood cancer.
Gianinazzi ME; Rueegg CS; Zimmerman K; Kuehni CE; Michel G;
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0124290. PubMed ID: 26001046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Analysis of quality data based on national clinical databases].
Utzon J; Petri AL; Christophersen S
Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Sep; 171(38):2723-7. PubMed ID: 19758494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How good are the data? USRDS data validation special study.
Am J Kidney Dis; 1992 Nov; 20(5 Suppl 2):68-83. PubMed ID: 1442778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of the reliability of data collected for the Department of Veterans Affairs national surgical quality improvement program.
Davis CL; Pierce JR; Henderson W; Spencer CD; Tyler C; Langberg R; Swafford J; Felan GS; Kearns MA; Booker B
J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Apr; 204(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17382213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Achieving a quality trauma database.
Petrovick L
J Trauma Nurs; 2004; 11(3):122-5. PubMed ID: 16512273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
