These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2215405)

  • 1. Comparison of ferrous sulfate (Fricke) and ionization dosimetry for high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Kwa W; Kornelsen RO
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(4):602-6. PubMed ID: 2215405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization of a Fricke dosimeter at high energy photon and electron beams used in radiotherapy.
    Moussous O; Khoudri S; Benguerba M
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2011 Dec; 34(4):523-8. PubMed ID: 21850550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ferrous sulphate dosimeter for control of ionization chamber dosimetry of electron and 60Co gamma beams.
    Mattsson LO; Johansson KA; Svensson H
    Acta Radiol Oncol; 1982; 21(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 6289615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dose conversion and wall correction factors for Fricke dosimetry in high-energy photon beams: analytical model and Monte Carlo calculations.
    Ma CM; Nahum AE
    Phys Med Biol; 1993 Jan; 38(1):93-114. PubMed ID: 8426871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of chemical and ionization dosimetry for high-energy x-ray and electron beams.
    Durocher JJ; Boese H; Cormack DV; Holloway AF
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 6798385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fricke dosimetry: the difference between G(Fe3+) for 60Co gamma-rays and high-energy x-rays.
    Klassen NV; Shortt KR; Seuntjens J; Ross CK
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Jul; 44(7):1609-24. PubMed ID: 10442700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wall-correction and absorbed-dose conversion factors for Fricke dosimetry: Monte Carlo calculations and measurements.
    Ma CM; Rogers DW; Shortt KR; Ross CK; Nahum AE; Bielajew AF
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(2 Pt 1):283-92. PubMed ID: 8497212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
    Tailor RC; Hanson WF
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical reference dosimetry: comparison between AAPM TG-21 and TG-51 protocols.
    Ding GX; Cygler JE; Kwok CB
    Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1217-25. PubMed ID: 10902550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feasibility study of the Fricke chemical dosimeter as an independent dosimetric system for the small animal radiation research platform (SARRP).
    Muñoz Arango E; Pickler A; Mantuano A; Salata C; de Almeida CE
    Phys Med; 2020 Mar; 71():168-175. PubMed ID: 32163885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the AAPM "Protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams" with currently used protocols.
    Hunt MA; Malik S; Thomason C; Masterson ME
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(6):806-13. PubMed ID: 6439991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of IAEA 1987 and AAPM 1983 protocols for dosimetry calibration of radiotherapy beams.
    Huq MS; Nath R
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 1901129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Verification of absorbed doses determined with thimble and parallel-plate ionization chambers in clinical electron beams using ferrous sulphate dosimetry.
    Van der Plaetsen A; Seuntjens J; Thierens H; Vynckier S
    Med Phys; 1994 Jan; 21(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 8164587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Andreo P
    Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11213922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of PENELOPE Monte Carlo dose calculations with Fricke dosimeter and ionization chamber measurements in heterogeneous phantoms (18 MeV electron and 12 MV photon beams).
    Blazy L; Baltes D; Bordy JM; Cutarella D; Delaunay F; Gouriou J; Leroy E; Ostrowsky A; Beaumont S
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5951-65. PubMed ID: 17068376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental determination of beam quality conversion factors k(Q) in clinical photon beams using ferrous sulphate (Fricke) dosimetry.
    Palm A; Mattsson O
    Med Phys; 2002 Dec; 29(12):2756-62. PubMed ID: 12512708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recommendations for clinical electron beam dosimetry: supplement to the recommendations of Task Group 25.
    Gerbi BJ; Antolak JA; Deibel FC; Followill DS; Herman MG; Higgins PD; Huq MS; Mihailidis DN; Yorke ED; Hogstrom KR; Khan FM
    Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3239-79. PubMed ID: 19673223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
    Araki F; Kubo HD
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The response of a radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeter in megavoltage photon and electron beams.
    Araki F; Ohno T
    Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):122102. PubMed ID: 25471975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of plastic protective caps on the calibration of therapy beams in water.
    Hanson WF; Tinoco JA
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(2):243-8. PubMed ID: 4000086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.