16 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2215416)
1. Method of simulated screen sensitometry for asymmetric, low crossover medical x-ray films.
Dickerson RE; Haus AG; Baker CW
Med Phys; 1994 Apr; 21(4):525-8. PubMed ID: 8058018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of light and x-ray sensitometric responses of double-emulsion films for different processing conditions.
Blendl C; Buhr E
Med Phys; 2001 Dec; 28(12):2420-6. PubMed ID: 11797944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sensitometric responses of selected medical radiographic films.
Kofler JM; Gray JE
Radiology; 1991 Dec; 181(3):879-83. PubMed ID: 1947114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Processor quality control in laser imaging systems.
Bogucki TM; Murphy WR; Baker CW; Piazza SS; Haus AG
Med Phys; 1997 Apr; 24(4):581-4. PubMed ID: 9127311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A time-scale sensitometric method for evaluating screen-film systems.
Góes EG; Pelá CA; Ghilardi NT
Phys Med Biol; 1997 Oct; 42(10):1939-46. PubMed ID: 9364589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Problems associated with simulated light sensitometry for low-crossover medical x-ray films.
Haus AG; Dickerson RE
Med Phys; 1990; 17(4):691-5. PubMed ID: 2215416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Technologic improvements in screen-film mammography.
Haus AG
Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):628-37. PubMed ID: 2406777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
