These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2215416)

  • 21. [A comparison of various methods of x-ray sensitometry].
    Maslov LA; Gurvich AM; Chikirdin EG; Il'ina MA; Popova TA
    Med Tekh; 1988; (5):36-41. PubMed ID: 3200152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Normalized sensitometric curves for the verification of hybrid IMRT treatment plans with multiple energies.
    Georg D; Kroupa B; Winkler P; Pötter R
    Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1142-50. PubMed ID: 12852539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Light sensitometry of mammography films at varying development temperatures and times.
    Sharma R; Sharma SD; Mayya YS
    J Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 37(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 22363111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [A gamma-ray sensitometer for film-screen combinations in diagnostic radiology].
    Nowotny R; Bliem J
    Rontgenblatter; 1985 Apr; 38(4):117-20. PubMed ID: 4001775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mammographic dual-screen-dual-emulsion-film combination: visibility of simulated microcalcifications and effect on image contrast.
    Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Roe D; Orr J
    Radiology; 1987 Nov; 165(2):313-8. PubMed ID: 3310091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Diagnostic quality of mammograms obtained with a new low-radiation-dose dual-screen and dual-emulsion film combination.
    Wojtasek DA; Teixidor HS; Govoni AF; Gareen IF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Feb; 154(2):265-70. PubMed ID: 2105011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Sensitivity differences of different emulsion numbers for different UV/blue-sensitive films].
    Blendl C; Goergens K
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 Nov; 8(6):288-92. PubMed ID: 9894529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A sensitometric comparison of four dental X-ray films and their diagnostic accuracy.
    Svenson B; Welander U; Shi XQ; Stamatakis H; Tronje G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jul; 26(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 9442614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sensitometric evaluation of four dental X-ray films using five processing solutions.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 10522195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sensitometric and image quality performance of "rapid" intraoral film processing techniques.
    Czajka J; Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):49-58. PubMed ID: 8785621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. Measures of screen-film performance.
    Haus AG
    Radiographics; 1996 Sep; 16(5):1165-81. PubMed ID: 8888396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Measurements of reciprocity law failure in green-sensitive X-ray films.
    Arnold BA; Eisenberg H; Bjärngard BE
    Radiology; 1978 Feb; 126(2):493-8. PubMed ID: 622504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sensitometric evaluation of some mammographic film-screen combinations.
    McLean D
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1991 Sep; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 1953502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparative physical evaluation of four X-ray films.
    Egyed M; Shearer DR
    Radiol Manage; 1981 Sep; 3(4):11-20. PubMed ID: 10253292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Characteristics of sensitometric curves of radiographic films.
    Zhu XR; Yoo S; Jursinic PA; Grimm DF; Lopez F; Rownd JJ; Gillin MT
    Med Phys; 2003 May; 30(5):912-9. PubMed ID: 12773000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Development of the automatic dental X-ray film processor].
    Bai J; Chen H
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 1999 Jul; 23(4):214-6. PubMed ID: 12583065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performance of various X-ray film/screen systems in demonstrating small simulated low-density lung nodules.
    Maruyama Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Aug; 58(9):509-15. PubMed ID: 9778937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of a cassette-screen-film combination for radiation therapy portal localization imaging with improved contrast.
    Haus AG; Dickerson RE; Huff KE; Monte S; Schlager BA; Atanas M; Matloubieh A
    Med Phys; 1997 Oct; 24(10):1605-8. PubMed ID: 9350713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Heuristic model for understanding x-ray film characteristics.
    Dixon RL; Ekstrand KE
    Med Phys; 1976 SEP-OCT; 3(5):340-5. PubMed ID: 979925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of developer exhaustion on the sensitometric properties of four dental films.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 10522196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.