These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2215468)
21. Need for clear and convincing evidence of a patient's wishes before artificial nutrition and hydration may be withdrawn. Brushwood DB Am J Hosp Pharm; 1990 Dec; 47(12):2720-2. PubMed ID: 2278289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Refusing life-sustaining treatment: can we just say no? O'Brien EJ Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 67(3):677-706. PubMed ID: 16044604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Is durable power working in Ohio? Ohio Med; 1991 Jul; 87(7):325-6. PubMed ID: 1870830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Decisions not to treat: the Saikewicz case and its aftermath. Glantz LH; Swazey JP Forum Med; 1979 Jan; 2(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 10289145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Planning ahead for difficult health care decisions. Mishkin B Healthspan; 1987 Apr; 4(4):3-25. PubMed ID: 10281748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Autonomy and the critically ill patient: the legal issues. Moskowitz LD; Moskowitz S Heart Lung; 1986 Sep; 15(5):520-4. PubMed ID: 3639078 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Judicial approach beginning to develop for terminating life support systems. Part 1. Weissburg C; Hartz JN Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1979 Aug; 12(4):44-8. PubMed ID: 10242941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Sustaining quality of life for patients with terminal illnesses. Rago JT; Poljak S Leg Med; 1986; ():216-34. PubMed ID: 3312891 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Incompetent's right to die: who decides? Bernstein AH Hospitals; 1979 Sep; 53(17):39, 42. PubMed ID: 457072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Family decision making on trial. Who decides for incompetent patients? Lo B; Rouse F; Dornbrand L N Engl J Med; 1990 Apr; 322(17):1228-32. PubMed ID: 2109196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Developments in foregoing life-sustaining treatment. Scofield GR Healthspan; 1989 Mar; 6(3):3-7. PubMed ID: 10292566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Bioethicists' statement on the U.S. Supreme Court's Cruzan decision. Annas GJ; Arnold B; Aroskar M; Battin P; Bartels D; Beauchamp T; Brock D; Buchanan A; Caplan A; Cohen C N Engl J Med; 1990 Sep; 323(10):686-7. PubMed ID: 2385279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Writing your own ending. Schafer A Can Doct; 1987 Apr; 53(4):GP6-7. PubMed ID: 10281591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Can a patient refuse a psychiatric consultation to evaluate decision-making capacity? Wenger NS; Halpern J J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 7841473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The incompetent developmentally disabled person's right of self-determination: right-to-die, sterilization and institutionalization. Krais WA Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):333-61. PubMed ID: 2603868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The biology of the persistent vegetative state: legal, ethical, and philosophical implications for transplantation. Downie J Transplant Proc; 1990 Jun; 22(3):995-6. PubMed ID: 2349730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Cruzan: no rights violated. Robertson JA Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):8-9. PubMed ID: 2228594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Right to die--court requires clear and convincing evidence of persistent vegetative patient's intent to terminate life-sustaining procedures; Health Care Decisions Act of 1993 casts new light on outcome. Brindisi TJ Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1994; 23(2):619-44. PubMed ID: 16086514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Right-to-die damage actions: developments in the law. Miller DH Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1990 Jul; (137):7-38. PubMed ID: 10105837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evolving Delaware law on the termination of life-sustaining treatment. Hayman S Del Med J; 1987 Mar; 59(3):205-8, 213-4. PubMed ID: 3569614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]