These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22155043)

  • 1. A spatiotemporal dynamic distributed solution to the MEG inverse problem.
    Lamus C; Hämäläinen MS; Temereanca S; Brown EN; Purdon PL
    Neuroimage; 2012 Nov; 63(2):894-909. PubMed ID: 22155043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Subspace Pursuit-based Iterative Greedy Hierarchical solution to the neuromagnetic inverse problem.
    Babadi B; Obregon-Henao G; Lamus C; Hämäläinen MS; Brown EN; Purdon PL
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 87():427-43. PubMed ID: 24055554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Localization Estimation Algorithm (LEA): a supervised prior-based approach for solving the EEG/MEG inverse problem.
    Mattout J; Pélégrini-Issac M; Bellio A; Daunizeau J; Benali H
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18():536-47. PubMed ID: 15344486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sparse current source estimation for MEG using loose orientation constraints.
    Chang WT; Ahlfors SP; Lin FH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2013 Sep; 34(9):2190-201. PubMed ID: 22438263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modified covariance beamformer for solving MEG inverse problem in the environment with correlated sources.
    Kuznetsova A; Nurislamova Y; Ossadtchi A
    Neuroimage; 2021 Mar; 228():117677. PubMed ID: 33385549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A spatially-regularized dynamic source localization algorithm for EEG.
    Pirondini E; Babadi B; Lamus C; Brown EN; Purdon PL
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():6752-5. PubMed ID: 23367479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A fast iterative greedy algorithm for MEG source localization.
    Obregon-Henao G; Babadi B; Lamus C; Brown EN; Purdon PL
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():6748-51. PubMed ID: 23367478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computationally Efficient Algorithms for Sparse, Dynamic Solutions to the EEG Source Localization Problem.
    Pirondini E; Babadi B; Obregon-Henao G; Lamus C; Malik WQ; Hamalainen MS; Purdon PL
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 Jun; 65(6):1359-1372. PubMed ID: 28920892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Large scale Kalman filtering solutions to the electrophysiological source localization problem--a MEG case study.
    Long CJ; Purdon RL; Temereanca S; Desai NU; Hämäläinen M; Brown EN
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():4532-5. PubMed ID: 17947095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
    Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A state-space modeling approach for localization of focal current sources from MEG.
    Fukushima M; Yamashita O; Kanemura A; Ishii S; Kawato M; Sato MA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Jun; 59(6):1561-71. PubMed ID: 22394573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hierarchical Bayesian inference for the EEG inverse problem using realistic FE head models: depth localization and source separation for focal primary currents.
    Lucka F; Pursiainen S; Burger M; Wolters CH
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jul; 61(4):1364-82. PubMed ID: 22537599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the performance of Kalman-filter-based EEG source localization.
    Barton MJ; Robinson PA; Kumar S; Galka A; Durrant-Whyte HF; Guivant J; Ozaki T
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Jan; 56(1):122-36. PubMed ID: 19224726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatially sparse source cluster modeling by compressive neuromagnetic tomography.
    Chang WT; Nummenmaa A; Hsieh JC; Lin FH
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 53(1):146-60. PubMed ID: 20488248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
    Engemann DA; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Line-source modeling and estimation with magnetoencephalography.
    Yetik IS; Nehorai A; Muravchik CH; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 May; 52(5):839-51. PubMed ID: 15887533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phase shift invariant imaging of coherent sources (PSIICOS) from MEG data.
    Ossadtchi A; Altukhov D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():950-971. PubMed ID: 30142449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How can intracranial recordings assist MEG source localization?
    Halgren E
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():86. PubMed ID: 16012657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.