These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22155149)

  • 1. Low copy number DNA profiling from isolated sperm using the aureka®-micromanipulation system.
    Schneider C; Müller U; Kilper R; Siebertz B
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jul; 6(4):461-5. PubMed ID: 22155149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Isolating sperm cells by laser capture microdissection technique from mixture sample].
    Liu F; Wang J; Yu LJ; Guo JZ; Gao JW; Jiao ZP; Tang H
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 27(1):33-5, 42. PubMed ID: 21542224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Micromanipulation of single cells and fingerprints for forensic identification.
    Ostojic L; O'Connor C; Wurmbach E
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Mar; 51():102430. PubMed ID: 33260060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A protocol for direct and rapid multiplex PCR amplification on forensically relevant samples.
    Verheij S; Harteveld J; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 21530436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sperm Hy-Liter™: an effective tool for the detection of spermatozoa in sexual assault exhibits.
    De Moors A; Georgalis T; Armstrong G; Modler J; Frégeau CJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 May; 7(3):367-79. PubMed ID: 23571070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laser microdissection separation of pure spermatozoa from epithelial cells for short tandem repeat analysis.
    Sanders CT; Sanchez N; Ballantyne J; Peterson DA
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jul; 51(4):748-57. PubMed ID: 16882215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new strategy for sperm isolation and STR typing from multi-donor sperm mixtures.
    Han JP; Yang F; Xu C; Wei YL; Zhao XC; Hu L; Ye J; Li CX
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():239-46. PubMed ID: 25240154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MtDNA typing of single-sperm cells isolated by micromanipulation.
    Pereira J; Neves R; Forat S; Huckenbeck W; Olek K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 21680273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A sort of meliorative method for testing DNA from sperm smear].
    Sun YD; Ren H; Chen YY
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004; 20(4):202-4. PubMed ID: 15751653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of histological staining on the analysis of human DNA from archived slides.
    Simons JL; Vintiner SK
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56 Suppl 1():S223-8. PubMed ID: 21198622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Single sperm cell isolation by laser microdissection.
    Di Martino D; Giuffrè G; Staiti N; Simone A; Le Donne M; Saravo L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Dec; 146 Suppl():S151-3. PubMed ID: 15639564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of three DNA extraction protocols for forensic STR typing after laser capture microdissection.
    Vandewoestyne M; Van Nieuwerburgh F; Van Hoofstat D; Deforce D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):258-62. PubMed ID: 21727054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct comparison of post-28-cycle PCR purification and modified capillary electrophoresis methods with the 34-cycle "low copy number" (LCN) method for analysis of trace forensic DNA samples.
    Forster L; Thomson J; Kutranov S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Sep; 2(4):318-28. PubMed ID: 19083842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a one-tube extraction and amplification method for DNA analysis of sperm and epithelial cells recovered from forensic samples by laser microdissection.
    Meredith M; Bright JA; Cockerton S; Vintiner S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jan; 6(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 21411390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Powerplex® ES versus Powerplex® S5--casework testing of the new screening kit.
    Poetsch M; Kamphausen T; Bajanowski T; Schwark T; von Wurmb-Schwark N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jan; 5(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 20457034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Low template STR typing: effect of replicate number and consensus method on genotyping reliability and DNA database search results.
    Benschop CC; van der Beek CP; Meiland HC; van Gorp AG; Westen AA; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):316-28. PubMed ID: 20655289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A rapid screening method using DNA binding dyes to determine whether hair follicles have sufficient DNA for successful profiling.
    Haines AM; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 May; 262():190-5. PubMed ID: 27038658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Autosomal short tandem repeat analysis of ancient DNA by coupled use of mini- and conventional STR kits.
    Oh CS; Lee SJ; Park JB; Lee SD; Seo SB; Kim HY; Kim J; Kim YS; Shin DH
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 May; 57(3):820-5. PubMed ID: 22268568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of a 21-locus autosomal SNP multiplex for forensic identification purposes.
    Dixon LA; Murray CM; Archer EJ; Dobbins AE; Koumi P; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Nov; 154(1):62-77. PubMed ID: 16182950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation and development of interpretation guidelines for low copy number (LCN) DNA profiling in New Zealand using the AmpFlSTR SGM Plus multiplex.
    Petricevic S; Whitaker J; Buckleton J; Vintiner S; Patel J; Simon P; Ferraby H; Hermiz W; Russell A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2010 Oct; 4(5):305-10. PubMed ID: 20457035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.