These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22156146)
1. Impact of media reporting of cervical cancer in a UK celebrity on a population-based cervical screening programme. MacArthur GJ; Wright M; Beer H; Paranjothy S J Med Screen; 2011; 18(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 22156146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Celebrities and screening: a measurable impact on high-grade cervical neoplasia diagnosis from the 'Jade Goody effect' in the UK. Casey GM; Morris B; Burnell M; Parberry A; Singh N; Rosenthal AN Br J Cancer; 2013 Sep; 109(5):1192-7. PubMed ID: 23963142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Six years' audit of laboratory workload and rates of referral for colposcopy in a cervical screening programme in three districts. Raffle AE; Alden B; Mackenzie EF BMJ; 1990 Oct; 301(6757):907-11. PubMed ID: 2261537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A retrospective study of cervical screening in women under 25 years (2005-2009). Ali AA; Richardson D; Hill N Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 287(4):765-9. PubMed ID: 23183714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Activity level and process indicators of organised programmes for cervical cancer screening in Italy. Ronco G; Giubilato P; Naldoni C; Zorzi M; Anghinoni E; Scalisi A; Dalla Palma P; Zanier L; Federici A; Angeloni C; Prandini S; Maglietta R; Mancini E; Pizzuti R; Iossa A; Segnan N; Zappa M Epidemiol Prev; 2006; 30(1 Suppl 3):27-40. PubMed ID: 16937844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Decision analysis for best management of mildly dyskaryotic smear. Johnson N; Sutton J; Thornton JG; Lilford RJ; Johnson VA; Peel KR Lancet; 1993 Jul; 342(8863):91-6. PubMed ID: 8100917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modelling the cost-effectiveness and capacity impact of changes to colposcopy referral guidelines for women with mild dyskaryosis in the UK Cervical Screening Programme. Hadwin R; Eggington S; Brennan A; Walker P; Patnick J; Pilgrim H BJOG; 2008 May; 115(6):749-57. PubMed ID: 18410660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Jade Goody Effect: whose cervical screening decisions were influenced by her story? Marlow LA; Sangha A; Patnick J; Waller J J Med Screen; 2012 Dec; 19(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 23271834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Colposcopy attendance and deprivation: A retrospective analysis of 27,193 women in the NHS Cervical Screening Programme. Douglas E; Wardle J; Massat NJ; Waller J Br J Cancer; 2015 Jun; 113(1):119-22. PubMed ID: 25996205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Media coverage and public reaction to a celebrity cancer diagnosis. Metcalfe D; Price C; Powell J J Public Health (Oxf); 2011 Mar; 33(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 20679285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of Jade Goody's diagnosis and death on the NHS Cervical Screening Programme. Lancucki L; Sasieni P; Patnick J; Day TJ; Vessey MP J Med Screen; 2012 Jun; 19(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 22653575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Extension of organised cervical cancer screening programmes in Italy and their process indicators, 2010 activity]. Ronco G; Giubilato P; Naldoni C; Zorzi M; Anghinoni E; Scalisi A; Dalla Palma P; Zanier L; Barca A; Angeloni C; Gaimo MD; Maglietta R; Mancini E; Pizzuti R; Iossa A; Segnan N; Zappa M Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(6 Suppl 1):39-54. PubMed ID: 23293270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Birth outcomes following treatment for precancerous changes to the cervix: a population-based record linkage study. Reilly R; Paranjothy S; Beer H; Brooks CJ; Fielder HM; Lyons RA BJOG; 2012 Jan; 119(2):236-44. PubMed ID: 21790951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Management of women with abnormal cervical cytology: treatment patterns and associated costs in England and Wales. Martin-Hirsch P; Rash B; Martin A; Standaert B BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 17378815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Human papillomavirus testing in young women: clinical outcomes of human papillomavirus triage in a UK cervical screening program. McKenna M; McMenamin MM Cancer Cytopathol; 2014 Sep; 122(9):702-10. PubMed ID: 24888573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Consequences of current patterns of Pap smear and colposcopy use. Kavanagh AM; Santow G; Mitchell H J Med Screen; 1996; 3(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 8861048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The agreement between self-reported cervical smear abnormalities and screening programme records. Canfell K; Beral V; Green J; Cameron R; Baker K; Brown A J Med Screen; 2006; 13(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 16792828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving uptake of cervical cancer screening in women with prolonged history of non-attendance for screening: a randomized trial of enhanced invitation methods. Stein K; Lewendon G; Jenkins R; Davis C J Med Screen; 2005; 12(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 16417695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The English National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme--approach to new technologies and quality assurance. Walker P J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2005 Apr; 9(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 15870534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Who defaults from colposcopy? A multi-centre, population-based, prospective cohort study of predictors of non-attendance for follow-up among women with low-grade abnormal cervical cytology. Sharp L; Cotton S; Thornton A; Gray N; Cruickshank M; Whynes D; Duncan I; Hammond R; Smart L; Little J Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Dec; 165(2):318-25. PubMed ID: 22921577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]