These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22156298)

  • 1. Doctors, patients and the human rights act.
    Burnton S
    Med Leg J; 2011; 79(Pt 4):115-25; discussion 125-8. PubMed ID: 22156298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human Rights Act 1998 and mental health legislation: implications for the management of mentally ill patients.
    Leung WC
    Postgrad Med J; 2002 Mar; 78(917):178-81. PubMed ID: 11884706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Eliminating mental disability as a legal criterion in deprivation of liberty cases: The impact of the Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities on the insanity defense, civil commitment, and competency law.
    Slobogin C
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 40():36-42. PubMed ID: 25960445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An introduction to law relevant to mentally disordered offenders.
    Dolan B
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2004; 14(2 Suppl):S12-8. PubMed ID: 23570119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Squibb academic address. Human rights: the case for the mentally ill.
    Mitchell R
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1984 Jun; 18(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 6593044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A change of direction in the disposal of mentally disordered offenders: the impact of the Crime (Sentences) Act 1997.
    Laing JM
    Med Sci Law; 1998 Oct; 38(4):301-10. PubMed ID: 9808941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Act of compulsion.
    Payne D
    Nurs Times; 1999 Nov 24-Dec 1; 95(47):14-5. PubMed ID: 11096893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A criminal between psychiatry and justice].
    Schröder A
    Psychiatr Prax; 1997 Jan; 24(1):43. PubMed ID: 9132783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Justifications for the insanity defence in Great Britain and the United States: the conflicting rationales of morality and compassion.
    Gostin LO
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1981; 9(2):100-15. PubMed ID: 7317652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clark v. Arizona: diminishing the right of mentally ill individuals to a full and fair defense.
    Wortzel H; Metzner J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):545-8. PubMed ID: 17185487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human rights vs. public protection. English mental health law in crisis?
    Davidson L
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2002; 25(5):491-515. PubMed ID: 12371264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The insanity defence.
    Pridmore S
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1992 Dec; 26(4):678, 680. PubMed ID: 1476536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ECHR 2005/12. Case of Kolanis v. The United Kingdom, 21 June 2005, no. 517/02 (fourth section).
    Dute J;
    Eur J Health Law; 2005 Sep; 12(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 17302051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mentally abnormal killers in the UK health care system: issues facing the multidisciplinary team.
    Hambridge JA
    J Forensic Sci; 1995 Jan; 40(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 7876806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ECHR 2005/1 Case of H. L. v. United Kingdom, 5 October 2004, no. 45508/99 (Fourth Section).
    Dute J;
    Eur J Health Law; 2005 Mar; 12(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 16080373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High Court rules that delays breach the rights of detained psychiatric patients.
    Mayor S
    BMJ; 2002 May; 324(7345):1058. PubMed ID: 11991906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The slayer statute and insanity.
    Piel J; Leong GB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(2):258-62. PubMed ID: 20542948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detention of psychiatric patients and international human rights: discussion paper.
    Cremona-Barbaro A
    J R Soc Med; 1983 Mar; 76(3):200-2. PubMed ID: 6834372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ECHR 2005/2 Case of Morley v. The United Kingdom, 5 October 2004, no. 16084/03 (Fourth Section) (Decision as to the admissibility).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2005 Mar; 12(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 16080374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A change of direction in the disposal of mentally disordered offenders: the impact of the Crime (Sentences) Act 1977.
    Prins H
    Med Sci Law; 1999 Jan; 39(1):90. PubMed ID: 10087849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.