These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22156663)

  • 1. Comparison of retention rates of fissure sealants using two flowable restorative materials and a conventional resin sealant: two-year follow-up.
    Oba AA; Sönmez IŞ; Ercan E; Dülgergil T
    Med Princ Pract; 2012; 21(3):234-7. PubMed ID: 22156663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized, controlled trial comparing the retention of a flowable restorative system with a conventional resin sealant: one-year follow up.
    Corona SA; Borsatto MC; Garcia L; Ramos RP; Palma-Dibb RG
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Jan; 15(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 15663444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of a flowable resin composite and flowable compomer for preventive resin restorations.
    Qin M; Liu H
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):580-7. PubMed ID: 16268391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Different Fissure Sealant Materials and Flowable Composites Used as Pit-and-fissure Sealants: A 24-Month Clinical Trial.
    Kucukyilmaz E; Savas S
    Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(5):468-73. PubMed ID: 26531092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study.
    Erdemir U; Sancakli HS; Yaman BC; Ozel S; Yucel T; Yıldız E
    J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 24296163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of a medium-filled flowable restorative material as a pit and fissure sealant.
    Autio-Gold JT
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 12120768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of Fluroshield with Delton fissure sealant: four year results.
    Lygidakis NA; Oulis KI
    Pediatr Dent; 1999; 21(7):429-31. PubMed ID: 10633516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite-based fissure sealant: two-year results.
    Güngör HC; Altay N; Alpar R
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 15195724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A 2-year clinical evaluation of two pit and fissure sealants placed with and without the use of a bonding agent.
    Boksman L; McConnell RJ; Carson B; McCutcheon-Jones EF
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Feb; 24(2):131-3. PubMed ID: 8511264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 2-year clinical performance of a fluoride-containing fissure sealant in young schoolchildren at caries risk.
    Carlsson A; Petersson M; Twetman S
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 9545884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The preventive resin (composite resin/sealant) restoration: nine-year results.
    Houpt M; Fukus A; Eidelman E
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Mar; 25(3):155-9. PubMed ID: 8008812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Handling and clinical performance of a glass ionomer sealant.
    Smales RJ; Lee YK; Lo FW; Tse CC; Chung MS
    Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):203-5. PubMed ID: 9545905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physical, mechanical and rheological characterization of resin-based pit and fissure sealants compared to flowable resin composites.
    Beun S; Bailly C; Devaux J; Leloup G
    Dent Mater; 2012 Apr; 28(4):349-59. PubMed ID: 22119547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical comparison of flowable composite to other fissure sealing materials--a 12 months study.
    Dukić W; Dukić OL; Milardović S; Vindakijević Z
    Coll Antropol; 2007 Dec; 31(4):1019-24. PubMed ID: 18217452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retention of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant and effect on carious outcome after 7 years.
    Forss H; Halme E
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1998 Feb; 26(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9511837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of a nonrinse conditioner on the durability of a polyacid-modified resin composite fissure sealant.
    Lampa E; Brechter A; van Dijken JW
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2004; 71(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 15587100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Application of fluoride releasing flowable resin in pit and fissure sealant of children with early enamel caries].
    Yan WJ; Zheng JJ; Chen XX
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Oct; 50(5):911-914. PubMed ID: 30337757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage evaluation of a flowable polyacid-modified resin composite used as fissure sealant on air-abraded permanent teeth.
    Güngör HC; Turgut MD; Attar N; Altay N
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 12760698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retention of a fluoride-releasing sealant compared with its non-fluoride analogue: interim results of a clinical study after an average of eight months.
    Heifetz SB; Yaari A; Proskin HM
    J Clin Dent; 2004; 15(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15218708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A clinical trial to evaluate the retention of a silver cermet-ionomer cement used as a fissure sealant.
    Mills RW; Ball IA
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(4):148-54. PubMed ID: 8152983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.