These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The changing face of scientific misconduct. Bevan D Clin Invest Med; 2004 Jun; 27(3):117-9. PubMed ID: 15305801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct. Resnik DB Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. O'Toole re-challenges: the Imanishi-Kari affair. O'Toole M Nature; 1991 Jun; 351(6329):692-3. PubMed ID: 1648174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The False Claims Act: litigating scientific misconduct II. Sherman S Public Health Rep; 1997; 112(3):248. PubMed ID: 9182306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific misconduct. Chained to the bench. Anderson C Nature; 1990 Nov; 348(6296):8. PubMed ID: 2234065 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific misconduct. NIH staffer finds warm reception on other side. Anderson C Nature; 1992 Jan; 355(6356):98. PubMed ID: 1309600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Research misconduct and its federal regulation: the origin and history of the Office of Research Integrity--with personal views by ORI's former associate director for investigative oversight. Price AR Account Res; 2013; 20(5-6):291-319. PubMed ID: 24028479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientific misconduct: ORI survey is flawed. Teitelbaum SL Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):739-40. PubMed ID: 12490917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientific misconduct: the state's role has limits. Korn D Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):739. PubMed ID: 12490916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Trouble for Healy over misconduct office. Aldhous P Nature; 1991 Aug; 352(6334):361. PubMed ID: 1650429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Robocops: Stewart and Feder's mechanized misconduct search. Anderson C Nature; 1991 Apr; 350(6318):454-5. PubMed ID: 1849615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Champions of science or blacklisting bureaucrats? Tokarski C J Am Health Policy; 1991; 1(3):45-9. PubMed ID: 10116471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New evidence emerges in Tufts misconduct case. Anderson C Nature; 1990 Sep; 347(6291):317. PubMed ID: 2170844 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Due process in investigations of research misconduct. Mello MM; Brennan TA N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Defining research misconduct: will we know it when we see it? Dresser R Hastings Cent Rep; 2001; 31(3):31-2. PubMed ID: 11478122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. ORI finds Imanishi-Kari guilty of misconduct, proposes 10-year ban. Gavaghan H Nature; 1994 Dec; 372(6505):391. PubMed ID: 7984221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]