These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2215681)
21. Single image random dot stereogram: principles and clinical implications. Lee DY; Ireland D J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Apr; 67(4):209-14. PubMed ID: 8888831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. PMF and its influence on computational stereo. Szeliski R Perception; 2009; 38(6):887-8; discussion 892-3. PubMed ID: 19806978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. A new method for assessing motion-in-depth perception in strabismic patients. Watanabe Y; Kezuka T; Harasawa K; Usui M; Yaguchi H; Shioiri S Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 92(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 17596334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Spatial frequency integration for binocular correspondence in macaque area V4. Kumano H; Tanabe S; Fujita I J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jan; 99(1):402-8. PubMed ID: 17959744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Objective evaluation of human and computational stereoscopic visual systems. Harris JM; Parker AJ Vision Res; 1994 Oct; 34(20):2773-85. PubMed ID: 7975313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The computation of multiple matching doubly ambiguous stereograms with transparent planes. Weinshall D Spat Vis; 1993; 7(2):183-98. PubMed ID: 8347551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The efficiency of depth discrimination for non-transparent and transparent stereoscopic surfaces. Wallace JM; Mamassian P Vision Res; 2004; 44(19):2253-67. PubMed ID: 15208012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Human stereo matching is not restricted to epipolar lines. Stevenson SB; Schor CM Vision Res; 1997 Oct; 37(19):2717-23. PubMed ID: 9373671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Seeing "ghost" planes in stereo vision. Weinshall D Vision Res; 1991; 31(10):1731-48. PubMed ID: 1767494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A contrast ratio constraint on stereo matching. Smallman HS; McKee SP Proc Biol Sci; 1995 Jun; 260(1359):265-71. PubMed ID: 7630895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A psychophysical and computational analysis of intensity-based stereo. Mallot HA; Arndt PA; Bülthoff HH Biol Cybern; 1996 Sep; 75(3):187-98. PubMed ID: 8974467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The interpretation of stereo-disparity information: the computation of surface orientation and depth. Mayhew J Perception; 1982; 11(4):387-403. PubMed ID: 7182798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A model of binocular stereopsis including a global consistency constraint. Sato N; Yano M Biol Cybern; 2000 May; 82(5):357-71. PubMed ID: 10836582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Modelling biological depth perception in binocular vision: the local disparity estimation. Lungeanu D; Popa C; Hotca S; Macovievici G Med Inform (Lond); 1998; 23(2):131-43. PubMed ID: 9667047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Learning stereo disparity using temporal smoothness constraints: a computational model. Stone JV Spat Vis; 1996; 10(1):15-29. PubMed ID: 8817769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Pre-attentive segmentation and correspondence in stereo. Zhaoping L Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2002 Dec; 357(1428):1877-83. PubMed ID: 12626021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Self-supervised learning in cooperative stereo vision correspondence. Decoux B Int J Neural Syst; 1997 Feb; 8(1):101-11. PubMed ID: 9228582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reliability analysis of the rank transform for stereo matching. Banks J; Bennamoun M IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2001; 31(6):870-80. PubMed ID: 18244853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]