1485 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22156867)
21. Laparoscopic and open anterior resection for upper and mid rectal cancer: an evaluation of outcomes.
Law WL; Lee YM; Choi HK; Seto CL; Ho JW
Dis Colon Rectum; 2006 Aug; 49(8):1108-15. PubMed ID: 16763756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Results of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma: retrospective analysis of 157 cases.
Pugliese R; Di Lernia S; Sansonna F; Scandroglio I; Maggioni D; Ferrari GC; Costanzi A; Magistro C; De Carli S
Am J Surg; 2008 Feb; 195(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 18083137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Laparoscopic versus open intersphincteric resection and coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: intermediate-term oncologic outcomes.
Park JS; Choi GS; Jun SH; Hasegawa S; Sakai Y
Ann Surg; 2011 Dec; 254(6):941-6. PubMed ID: 22076066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Utilization of interventional radiology in the postoperative management of patients after surgery for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer.
Llaguna OH; Calvo BF; Stitzenberg KB; Deal AM; Burke CT; Dixon RG; Stavas JM; Meyers MO
Am Surg; 2011 Aug; 77(8):1086-90. PubMed ID: 21944529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Robot-Assisted Abdominoperineal Resection: Clinical, Pathologic, and Oncologic Outcomes.
Eftaiha SM; Pai A; Sulo S; Park JJ; Prasad LM; Marecik SJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jul; 59(7):607-14. PubMed ID: 27270512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Efficacy of local resection on lower rectal cancer of early stage: efficacy of report of 23 cases].
Hong J; Tang YQ
Ai Zheng; 2005 Jan; 24(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 15642206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer at a specialty center.
Nissan A; Guillem JG; Paty PB; Douglas Wong W; Minsky B; Saltz L; Cohen AM
Dis Colon Rectum; 2001 Jan; 44(1):27-35; discussion 35-6. PubMed ID: 11805560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A population-based study on outcome in relation to the type of resection in low rectal cancer.
Anderin C; Martling A; Hellborg H; Holm T
Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 May; 53(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 20389209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Oncologic outcomes after resection of rectal cancer: Laparoscopic versus open approach.
Sambasivan CN; Deveney KE; Morris KT
Am J Surg; 2010 May; 199(5):599-603. PubMed ID: 20466102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Oncologic outcome after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with pathologic T0 (ypT0) rectal cancer.
Jang TY; Yu CS; Yoon YS; Lim SB; Hong SM; Kim TW; Kim JH; Kim JC
Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Oct; 55(10):1024-31. PubMed ID: 22965400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer results in higher lymph node yield and better short-term outcomes than open surgery: a large single-center comparative study.
Boutros M; Hippalgaonkar N; Silva E; Allende D; Wexner SD; Berho M
Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Jun; 56(6):679-88. PubMed ID: 23652740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.
West NP; Finan PJ; Anderin C; Lindholm J; Holm T; Quirke P
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jul; 26(21):3517-22. PubMed ID: 18541901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Multicenter study of outcome in relation to the type of resection in rectal cancer.
Ortiz H; Wibe A; Ciga MA; Kreisler E; Garcia-Granero E; Roig JV; Biondo S;
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Jul; 57(7):811-22. PubMed ID: 24901681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Low rectal cancer: classification and standardization of surgery.
Rullier E; Denost Q; Vendrely V; Rullier A; Laurent C
Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 May; 56(5):560-7. PubMed ID: 23575394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Total excision of the mesorectum in cancer of the lower and middle rectum. Oncological and functional results].
Kneist W; Heintz A; Wolf HK; Junginger T
Chirurg; 2003 Feb; 74(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 12599030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Factors affecting circumferential resection margin involvement after rectal cancer excision.
Tilney HS; Tekkis PP; Sains PS; Constantinides VA; Heriot AG;
Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Jan; 50(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 17115338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effect of circumferential tumor location in clinical outcomes of rectal cancer patients treated with total mesorectal excision.
Lee SH; Hernandez de Anda E; Finne CO; Madoff RD; Garcia-Aguilar J
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Dec; 48(12):2249-57. PubMed ID: 16400512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Preservation of the continence function after intersphincteric resection using a prolapsing technique in the patients with low rectal cancer and its clinical prognosis.
Dai Y; Jiang JB; Bi DS; Jin ZT; Sun JZ; Hu SY
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Oct; 121(20):2016-20. PubMed ID: 19080267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival after resection for rectal cancer.
Mrak K; Eberl T; Laske A; Jagoditsch M; Fritz J; Tschmelitsch J
Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Jan; 56(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 23222276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Previous transanal full-thickness excision increases the morbidity of radical resection for rectal cancer.
Piessen G; Cabral C; Benoist S; Penna C; Nordlinger B
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Apr; 14(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 21689342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
