BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22156872)

  • 1. Assessment of the quality of patient-orientated Internet information on surgery for diverticular disease.
    Yeung TM; Mortensen NJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jan; 55(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 22156872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of the Quality of Patient-Orientated Information on Surgery for Crohn's Disease on the Internet.
    Yeung TM; Sacchi M; Mortensen NJ; Spinelli A
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Sep; 58(9):857-61. PubMed ID: 26252847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the quality of patient-orientated internet information on surgery for ulcerative colitis.
    Sacchi M; Yeung TM; Spinelli A; Mortensen NJ
    Colorectal Dis; 2015 Jun; 17(6):511-4. PubMed ID: 25510335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of the quality of web-based information on bunions.
    Chong YM; Fraval A; Chandrananth J; Plunkett V; Tran P
    Foot Ankle Int; 2013 Aug; 34(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 23478888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The quality of patient-orientated internet information on colorectal cancer.
    Al-Bahrani A; Plusa S
    Colorectal Dis; 2004 Sep; 6(5):323-6. PubMed ID: 15335363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of natural health products in treating osteoporosis: what is the quality of internet patient advice?
    Whelan AM; Jurgens TM; Bowles SK; Doyle H
    Ann Pharmacother; 2009 May; 43(5):899-907. PubMed ID: 19417114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What do patients know about their low back pain? An analysis of the quality of information available on the Internet.
    Galbusera F; Brayda-Bruno M; Freutel M; Seitz A; Steiner M; Wehrle E; Wilke HJ
    Technol Health Care; 2012; 20(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 23187011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A critical evaluation of Web sites offering patient information on tinnitus.
    Kieran SM; Skinner LJ; Donnelly M; Smyth DA
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2010 Jan; 89(1):E11-4. PubMed ID: 20155682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Web-based portrayal of platelet-rich plasma injections for orthopedic therapy.
    Deren ME; DiGiovanni CW; Feller E
    Clin J Sport Med; 2011 Sep; 21(5):428-32. PubMed ID: 21892016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating internet health resources in ear, nose, and throat surgery.
    Goslin RA; Elhassan HA
    Laryngoscope; 2013 Jul; 123(7):1626-31. PubMed ID: 23720201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is internet information adequate to facilitate surgical decision-making in familial adenomatous polyposis?
    Neuman HB; Cabral C; Charlson ME; Temple LK
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Dec; 50(12):2135-41. PubMed ID: 17828400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How good is Google? The quality of otolaryngology information on the internet.
    Pusz MD; Brietzke SE
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Sep; 147(3):462-5. PubMed ID: 22597577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality analysis of patient information about knee arthroscopy on the World Wide Web.
    Sambandam SN; Ramasamy V; Priyanka P; Ilango B
    Arthroscopy; 2007 May; 23(5):509-513.e2. PubMed ID: 17478282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing cancer treatment related information online: unintended retrieval of complementary and alternative medicine web sites.
    Kim DY; Lee HR; Nam EM
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2009 Jan; 18(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 18771532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of the malnutrition related information on the internet.
    Dash NR; Pipal K; Kaza SK; Panigrahi P; Joshi A
    Technol Health Care; 2012; 20(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 22508023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The sources and popularity of online drug information: an analysis of top search engine results and web page views.
    Law MR; Mintzes B; Morgan SG
    Ann Pharmacother; 2011 Mar; 45(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 21343404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Myelomeningocele information on the internet is accessible and of variable quality, and requires a high reading level.
    Bergman J; Konijeti R; Lerman SE
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1138-42. PubMed ID: 17296433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of internet sites for burn scar management.
    Bohacek L; Gomez M; Fish JS
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 2003; 24(4):246-51; discussion 245. PubMed ID: 14501424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Analysis of paediatric neuro-oncological information on the Internet in German language].
    Bartels U; Hargrave D; Lau L; Esquembre C; Humpl T; Bouffet E
    Klin Padiatr; 2003; 215(6):352-7. PubMed ID: 14677102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A systematic critique of diabetes on the world wide web for patients and their physicians.
    Bedell SE; Agrawal A; Petersen LE
    Int J Med Inform; 2004 Sep; 73(9-10):687-94. PubMed ID: 15325325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.