These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
529 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22156887)
1. Indications and outcomes following complex abdominal reconstruction with component separation combined with porcine acellular dermal matrix reinforcement. Patel KM; Nahabedian MY; Gatti M; Bhanot P Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 69(4):394-8. PubMed ID: 22156887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of porcine acellular dermal matrix in a bridge technique for complex abdominal wall reconstruction: an outcome analysis. Patel KM; Nahabedian MY; Albino F; Bhanot P Am J Surg; 2013 Feb; 205(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 23195145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Primary fascial closure with mesh reinforcement is superior to bridged mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction. Booth JH; Garvey PB; Baumann DP; Selber JC; Nguyen AT; Clemens MW; Liu J; Butler CE J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Dec; 217(6):999-1009. PubMed ID: 24083910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Component separation with porcine acellular dermal reinforcement is superior to traditional bridged mesh repairs in the open repair of significant midline ventral hernia defects. Richmond B; Ubert A; Judhan R; King J; Harrah T; Dyer B; Thompson S Am Surg; 2014 Aug; 80(8):725-31. PubMed ID: 25105388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Noncrosslinked porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix for single-stage complex abdominal wall herniorrhaphy after removal of infected synthetic mesh: a retrospective review. Guerra O Am Surg; 2014 May; 80(5):489-95. PubMed ID: 24887729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Immediate, Multistaged Approach to Infected Synthetic Mesh: Outcomes After Abdominal Wall Reconstruction With Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix. Albino FP; Patel KM; Nahabedian MY; Attinger CE; Bhanot P Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Dec; 75(6):629-33. PubMed ID: 24667884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes Analysis of Biologic Mesh Use for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction in Clean-Contaminated and Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair. Sbitany H; Kwon E; Chern H; Finlayson E; Varma MG; Hansen SL Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Aug; 75(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 24317239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes with porcine acellular dermal matrix versus synthetic mesh and suture in complicated open ventral hernia repair. Liang MK; Berger RL; Nguyen MT; Hicks SC; Li LT; Leong M Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2014 Oct; 15(5):506-12. PubMed ID: 25215466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complex abdominal wall reconstruction: an outcomes review. Henry CR; Bradburn E; Moyer KE Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Sep; 71(3):266-8. PubMed ID: 23945531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Impact of Mesh Reinforcement with Components Separation for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction. Razavi SA; Desai KA; Hart AM; Thompson PW; Losken A Am Surg; 2018 Jun; 84(6):959-962. PubMed ID: 29981631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A 5-year clinical experience with single-staged repairs of infected and contaminated abdominal wall defects utilizing biologic mesh. Rosen MJ; Krpata DM; Ermlich B; Blatnik JA Ann Surg; 2013 Jun; 257(6):991-6. PubMed ID: 23426340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Porcine acellular dermal matrix (PADM) vascularises after exposure in open necrotic wounds seen after complex hernia repair. Gowda AU; Chang SM; Chopra K; Matthews JA; Sabino J; Stromberg JA; Zahiri HR; Pinczewski J; Holton LH; Silverman RP; Singh DP Int Wound J; 2016 Oct; 13(5):972-6. PubMed ID: 26688300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Comparison of Component Separation With Porcine Acellular Dermal Reinforcement to Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix in the Repair of Significant Midline Ventral Hernia Defects. Lightfoot RW; Thrash C; Thompson S; Richmond BK Am Surg; 2023 Apr; 89(4):1003-1008. PubMed ID: 34772290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix are not affected by wound contamination. Garvey PB; Martinez RA; Baumann DP; Liu J; Butler CE J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Nov; 219(5):853-64. PubMed ID: 25440025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of human acellular dermal matrix for hernia repair: friend or foe? Candage R; Jones K; Luchette FA; Sinacore JM; Vandevender D; Reed RL Surgery; 2008 Oct; 144(4):703-9; discussion 709-11. PubMed ID: 18847657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recurrent intestinal fistulation after porcine acellular dermal matrix reinforcement in enteric fistula takedown and simultaneous abdominal wall reconstruction. Kalaiselvan R; Carlson GL; Hayes S; Lees NP; Anderson ID; Slade DAJ Hernia; 2020 Jun; 24(3):537-543. PubMed ID: 31811593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Complex Ventral Hernia Repair with Acellular Dermal Matrices: Clinical and Quality of Life Outcomes. Roth JS; Zachem A; Plymale MA; Davenport DL Am Surg; 2017 Feb; 83(2):141-147. PubMed ID: 28228200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immediate breast reconstruction using porcine acellular dermal matrix (Stratticeā¢): long-term outcomes and complications. Salzberg CA; Dunavant C; Nocera N J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Mar; 66(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 23153519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-crosslinked porcine acellular dermal matrix in pediatric abdominal wall reconstruction: a case series. Siy RW; Pferdehirt RE; Izaddoost SA J Pediatr Surg; 2017 Apr; 52(4):639-643. PubMed ID: 27726880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abdominal wall reconstruction: a case series of ventral hernia repair using the component separation technique with biologic mesh. Hood K; Millikan K; Pittman T; Zelhart M; Secemsky B; Rajan M; Myers J; Luu M Am J Surg; 2013 Mar; 205(3):322-7; discussion 327-8. PubMed ID: 23351508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]