244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22156894)
1. Which algorithm should be used to screen for syphilis?
Binnicker MJ
Curr Opin Infect Dis; 2012 Feb; 25(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 22156894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Evaluation of a syphilis testing algorithm using a treponemal test for screening].
Ozbek OA; Doğan Y
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Jan; 45(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 21341164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Discordant results from reverse sequence syphilis screening--five laboratories, United States, 2006-2010.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2011 Feb; 60(5):133-7. PubMed ID: 21307823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Syphilis testing algorithms using treponemal tests for initial screening--four laboratories, New York City, 2005-2006.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2008 Aug; 57(32):872-5. PubMed ID: 18701877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The tale of two serologic tests to screen for syphilis--treponemal and nontreponemal: does the order matter?
Owusu-Edusei K; Koski KA; Ballard RC
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 May; 38(5):448-56. PubMed ID: 21183862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characteristics of primary and late latent syphilis cases which were initially non-reactive with the rapid plasma reagin as the screening test.
Singh AE; Wong T; De P
Int J STD AIDS; 2008 Jul; 19(7):464-8. PubMed ID: 18574118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of a dual non-treponemal/treponemal syphilis point-of-care test to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa.
Owusu-Edusei K; Gift TL; Ballard RC
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Nov; 38(11):997-1003. PubMed ID: 21992974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of age, gender, and pregnancy on syphilis screening using the Captia Syphilis-G assay.
Henrich TJ; Yawetz S
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Dec; 38(12):1126-30. PubMed ID: 22082723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the BioPlex 2200 syphilis total screen (IgG/IgM) with reflex to an automated rapid plasma reagin test.
Rourk AR; Litwin CM
J Clin Lab Anal; 2019 Jun; 33(5):e22878. PubMed ID: 30861169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic dilemma of the single screening test used in the diagnosis of syphilis in Nepal.
Dumre SP; Shakya G; Acharya D; Malla S; Adhikari N
Nepal Med Coll J; 2011 Dec; 13(4):238-40. PubMed ID: 23016470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prevalence of Traditional and Reverse-Algorithm Syphilis Screening in Laboratory Practice: A Survey of Participants in the College of American Pathologists Syphilis Serology Proficiency Testing Program.
Rhoads DD; Genzen JR; Bashleben CP; Faix JD; Ansari MQ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2017 Jan; 141(1):93-97. PubMed ID: 27763779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Challenges of Rapid Plasma Reagin Interpretation in Syphilis Screening in Uganda: Variability in Nontreponemal Results Between Different Laboratories.
Hamill MM; Mbazira KJ; Kiragga AN; Gaydos CA; Jett-Goheen M; Parkes-Ratanshi R; Manabe YC; Nakku-Joloba E; Rompalo A
Sex Transm Dis; 2018 Dec; 45(12):829-833. PubMed ID: 29944643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using Treponemal Assay Signal Strength Cutoff Ratios To Predict Syphilis Infection.
Bristow CC; Klausner JD
J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 56(1):. PubMed ID: 29046409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of automated architect syphilis TP as a diagnostic laboratory screening test for syphilis].
Kim J; Kim WH; Cho C; Kim J; Kim GY; Nam MH; Kim JS; Bae SY; Cho Y
Korean J Lab Med; 2008 Dec; 28(6):475-82. PubMed ID: 19127113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening for syphilis with dual algorithms: analysis of discordant and concordant serology results in a population with a low prevalence of syphilis.
Zhuang YH; Liu H; Tang J; Wang YZ; Zheng XH; Gong Y; Xu XF; Gao X; Lu RQ; Ju SG; Guo L
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2019 Jan; 33(1):178-184. PubMed ID: 30223307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of automated treponemal and nontreponemal test algorithms as first-line syphilis screening assays.
Huh HJ; Chung JW; Park SY; Chae SL
Ann Lab Med; 2016 Jan; 36(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 26522755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Serologic testing for syphilis in the United States: a cost-effectiveness analysis of two screening algorithms.
Owusu-Edusei K; Peterman TA; Ballard RC
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Jan; 38(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 20739911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Introduction of rapid tests for large-scale syphilis screening among female, male, and transgender sex workers in Mumbai, India.
Gupte S; Daly C; Agarwal V; Gaikwad SB; George B
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Jun; 38(6):499-502. PubMed ID: 21183861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Serological diagnosis of syphilis: a comparison of different diagnostic methods.
Simčič S; Potočnik M
Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat; 2015; 24(2):17-20. PubMed ID: 26086162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of 3 algorithms for syphilis serodiagnosis and implications for clinical management.
Tong ML; Lin LR; Liu LL; Zhang HL; Huang SJ; Chen YY; Guo XJ; Xi Y; Liu L; Chen FY; Zhang YF; Zhang Q; Yang TC
Clin Infect Dis; 2014 Apr; 58(8):1116-24. PubMed ID: 24550376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
