These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

532 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22158197)

  • 1. Factors influencing the shade matching performance of dentists and dental technicians when using two different shade guides.
    Alomari M; Chadwick RG
    Br Dent J; 2011 Dec; 211(11):E23. PubMed ID: 22158197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual and instrumental evaluation of color match ability of 2 shade guides on a ceramic system.
    Öngül D; Şermet B; Balkaya MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jul; 108(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 22765984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shading of ceramic crowns using digital tooth shade matching devices.
    Baltzer A; Kaufmann-Jinoian V
    Int J Comput Dent; 2005 Apr; 8(2):129-52. PubMed ID: 16201397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Colour discrimination of dental professionals and colour deficient laypersons.
    Poljak-Guberina R; Celebic A; Powers JM; Paravina RD
    J Dent; 2011 Dec; 39 Suppl 3():e17-22. PubMed ID: 21996337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selecting VITA classical shades with the VITA 3D-master shade guide.
    Zenthöfer A; Wiesberg S; Hildenbrandt A; Reinelt G; Rammelsberg P; Hassel AJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(4):376-82. PubMed ID: 25010883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical performance of a newly developed spectrophotometric system on tooth color reproduction.
    Da Silva JD; Park SE; Weber HP; Ishikawa-Nagai S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):361-8. PubMed ID: 18456047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating factors that affect the shade-matching ability of dentists, dental staff members and laypeople.
    Capa N; Malkondu O; Kazazoglu E; Calikkocaoglu S
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Jan; 141(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 20045824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of shade tab arrangement on the repeatability and accuracy of shade selection.
    Yılmaz B; Yuzugullu B; Cınar D; Berksun S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jun; 105(6):383-6. PubMed ID: 21640239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of time consumption and color matching results of different dental occupational groups.
    Ortolan SM; Persic S; Celebic A; Mehulic K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 23998147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shade matching performance of normal and color vision-deficient dental professionals with standard daylight and tungsten illuminants.
    Gokce HS; Piskin B; Ceyhan D; Gokce SM; Arisan V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Mar; 103(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 20188236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimization of tooth color and shade guide design.
    Paravina RD; Majkic G; Imai FH; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 17451478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spectrophotometric evaluation of color match to VITA classical shade guide of four different veneering porcelain systems for metal ceramic restorations.
    Fazi G; Vichi A; Corciolani G; Ferrari M
    Am J Dent; 2009 Feb; 22(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 19281108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance assessment of dental shade guides.
    Paravina RD
    J Dent; 2009; 37 Suppl 1():e15-20. PubMed ID: 19329240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of digital imaging for colour matching and communication in restorative dentistry.
    Jarad FD; Russell MD; Moss BW
    Br Dent J; 2005 Jul; 199(1):43-9; discussion 33. PubMed ID: 16003426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a newly developed visual shade-matching apparatus.
    Paravina RD
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 12475156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does gender and experience influence shade matching quality?
    Haddad HJ; Jakstat HA; Arnetzl G; Borbely J; Vichi A; Dumfahrt H; Renault P; Corcodel N; Pohlen B; Marada G; de Parga JA; Reshad M; Klinke TU; Hannak WB; Paravina RD
    J Dent; 2009; 37 Suppl 1():e40-4. PubMed ID: 19520478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Communication is vital to produce natural looking metal ceramic crowns.
    Jun S
    J Dent Technol; 1997 Oct; 14(8):15-20. PubMed ID: 9586552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Tooth color matching systems and communication with dental laboratory in indirect restorations: 2011 update].
    Ginzburg M; Gilboa I
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2012 Jan; 29(1):28-34, 64. PubMed ID: 22991874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides.
    Hammad IA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 12589286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the ability of dental technician students and graduate dentists to match tooth color.
    Sinmazisik G; Trakyali G; Tarcin B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1559-66. PubMed ID: 25134993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.