BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22158633)

  • 1. Development of the screening test for hearing problems.
    Demorest ME; Wark DJ; Erdman SA
    Am J Audiol; 2011 Dec; 20(2):100-10. PubMed ID: 22158633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving the quality and applicability of the Dutch scales of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired using item response theory.
    Mokkink LB; Knol DL; van Nispen RM; Kramer SE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 53(3):556-71. PubMed ID: 20530379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factor structure and reliability of the Dutch version of seven scales of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired (CPHI).
    Mokkink LB; Knol DL; Zekveld AA; Goverts ST; Kramer SE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Apr; 52(2):454-64. PubMed ID: 18952858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scale composition and item analysis of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired.
    Demorest ME; Erdman SA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Dec; 29(4):515-35. PubMed ID: 3795894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing pure-tone audiometry and auditory steady state response for the measurement of hearing loss.
    Ahn JH; Lee HS; Kim YJ; Yoon TH; Chung JW
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Jun; 136(6):966-71. PubMed ID: 17547989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Communicative ability in an audiological perspective. Theory and application to post-secondary school students.
    Borg E; Samuelsson E; Danermark B; Rönnberg J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1999; 50():i-iv, 1-36. PubMed ID: 10810771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory rehabilitation of older people from the general population--the Leiden 85-plus study.
    Gussekloo J; de Bont LE; von Faber M; Eekhof JA; de Laat JA; Hulshof JH; van Dongen E; Westendorp RG
    Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Jul; 53(492):536-40. PubMed ID: 14694666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adjustment to hearing impairment I: description of a heterogeneous clinical population.
    Erdman SA; Demorest ME
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Feb; 41(1):107-22. PubMed ID: 9493738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can self assessment of communication predict hearing loss?
    Vij S; Nagarkar AN; Jindal P
    J Laryngol Otol; 2007 May; 121(5):435-7. PubMed ID: 17125575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychometric evaluation of a Norwegian version of the Communication Strategies Scale of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired.
    Helvik AS; Thürmer H; Jacobsen GW; Bratt M; Hallberg LR
    Disabil Rehabil; 2007 Mar; 29(6):513-20. PubMed ID: 17364806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of self-reported and audiometrically-measured hearing loss in the Australian Defence Force.
    Kirk KM; McGuire A; Nasveld PE; Treloar SA
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):294-8. PubMed ID: 22149463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Severe difficulties with word recognition in noise after platinum chemotherapy in childhood, and improvements with open-fitting hearing-aids.
    Einarsson EJ; Petersen H; Wiebe T; Fransson PA; Magnusson M; Moëll C
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Oct; 50(10):642-51. PubMed ID: 21812630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multimedia hearing handicap inventory: reliability and clinical utility.
    Holcomb SS; Punch JL
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 15(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 16803787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Hearing handicap--an addition to audiometric hearing loss. Results of an exploratory study of auditory communication disorders in the elderly].
    Bertoli S; Probst R; Jordan P
    HNO; 1996 Jul; 44(7):376-84. PubMed ID: 8926183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The French digit triplet test: a hearing screening tool for speech intelligibility in noise.
    Jansen S; Luts H; Wagener KC; Frachet B; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2010 May; 49(5):378-87. PubMed ID: 20380611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Self-reported hearing difficulties, communication strategies and psychological general well-being (quality of life) in patients with acquired hearing impairment.
    Hallberg LR; Hallberg U; Kramer SE
    Disabil Rehabil; 2008; 30(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 17852289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech understanding in noise with an eyeglass hearing aid: asymmetric fitting and the head shadow benefit of anterior microphones.
    Mens LH
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21047292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validity of pure-tone hearing screening at well-child visits.
    Halloran DR; Hardin JM; Wall TC
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2009 Feb; 163(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 19188648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.