These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The influence of clutter on real-world scene search: evidence from search efficiency and eye movements. Henderson JM; Chanceaux M; Smith TJ J Vis; 2009 Jan; 9(1):32.1-8. PubMed ID: 19271902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Regional effects of clutter on human target detection performance. Asher MF; Tolhurst DJ; Troscianko T; Gilchrist ID J Vis; 2013 Apr; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 23620535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measuring search efficiency in complex visual search tasks: global and local clutter. Beck MR; Lohrenz MC; Trafton JG J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Sep; 16(3):238-50. PubMed ID: 20853984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A crowding model of visual clutter. van den Berg R; Cornelissen FW; Roerdink JB J Vis; 2009 Apr; 9(4):24.1-11. PubMed ID: 19757933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parametric modeling of visual search efficiency in real scenes. Zhang X; Li Q; Zou Q; Fang Z; Zhou B PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128545. PubMed ID: 26030908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Object co-occurrence serves as a contextual cue to guide and facilitate visual search in a natural viewing environment. Mack SC; Eckstein MP J Vis; 2011 Aug; 11(9):1-16. PubMed ID: 21856869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Asymmetries in the direction of saccades during perception of scenes and fractals: effects of image type and image features. Foulsham T; Kingstone A Vision Res; 2010 Apr; 50(8):779-95. PubMed ID: 20144645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Searching for camouflaged targets: effects of target-background similarity on visual search. Neider MB; Zelinsky GJ Vision Res; 2006 Jul; 46(14):2217-35. PubMed ID: 16497351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual search for rare targets: distracter tuning as a mechanism for learning from repeated target-absent searches. Levin DT; Angelone BL; Beck MR Br J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 102(3):313-27. PubMed ID: 21751991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does conspicuity enhance distraction? Saliency and eye landing position when searching for objects. Foulsham T; Underwood G Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1088-98. PubMed ID: 19142829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Components of bottom-up gaze allocation in natural images. Peters RJ; Iyer A; Itti L; Koch C Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(18):2397-416. PubMed ID: 15935435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Semantic memory for contextual regularities within and across scene categories: evidence from eye movements. Brockmole JR; Le-Hoa Võ M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1803-13. PubMed ID: 20952779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Natural image clutter degrades overt search performance independently of set size. Semizer Y; Michel MM J Vis; 2019 Apr; 19(4):1. PubMed ID: 30933237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visual search in natural scenes explained by local color properties. Amano K; Foster DH; Mould MS; Oakley JP J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2012 Feb; 29(2):A194-9. PubMed ID: 22330379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scene and screen center bias early eye movements in scene viewing. Bindemann M Vision Res; 2010 Nov; 50(23):2577-87. PubMed ID: 20732344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A scale invariant measure of clutter. Bravo MJ; Farid H J Vis; 2008 Jan; 8(1):23.1-9. PubMed ID: 18318626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in the functional visual field during search with and without eye movements. Motter BC; Simoni DA Vision Res; 2008 Oct; 48(22):2382-93. PubMed ID: 18722398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]