These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22160872)

  • 1. The origin of the interaction between learning method and delay in the testing effect: the roles of processing and conceptual retrieval organization.
    Congleton A; Rajaram S
    Mem Cognit; 2012 May; 40(4):528-39. PubMed ID: 22160872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of learning methods on collaboration: prior repeated retrieval enhances retrieval organization, abolishes collaborative inhibition, and promotes post-collaborative memory.
    Congleton AR; Rajaram S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):535-51. PubMed ID: 21744986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Context change and retrieval difficulty in the list-before-last paradigm.
    Sahakyan L; Hendricks HE
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Aug; 40(6):844-60. PubMed ID: 22391953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?
    Grimaldi PJ; Karpicke JD
    Mem Cognit; 2012 May; 40(4):505-13. PubMed ID: 22238214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An item gains and losses analysis of false memories suggests critical items receive more item-specific processing than list items.
    Burns DJ; Martens NJ; Bertoni AA; Sweeney EJ; Lividini MD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 16569146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are judgments of learning made after correct responses during retrieval practice sensitive to lag and criterion level effects?
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Aug; 40(6):976-88. PubMed ID: 22399224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hypermnesia and the Role of Delay between Study and Test.
    Wallner LA; Bäuml KT
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Aug; 46(6):878-894. PubMed ID: 29696580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fact learning: how information accuracy, delay, and repeated testing change retention and retrieval experience.
    Barber SJ; Rajaram S; Marsh EJ
    Memory; 2008 Nov; 16(8):934-46. PubMed ID: 18949663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Free recall enhances subsequent learning.
    Arnold KM; McDermott KB
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Jun; 20(3):507-13. PubMed ID: 23297100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retrieval practice decreases processing load of recall: Evidence revealed by pupillometry.
    Pajkossy P; Szőllősi Á; Racsmány M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Sep; 143():88-95. PubMed ID: 31301313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Critical Importance of Retrieval--and Spacing--for Learning.
    Soderstrom NC; Kerr TK; Bjork RA
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Feb; 27(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 26674128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Control processes in short-term storage: Retrieval strategies in immediate recall depend upon the number of words to be recalled.
    Ward G; Tan L
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):658-682. PubMed ID: 30617748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. List-method directed forgetting: the forget cue improves both encoding and retrieval of postcue information.
    Pastötter B; Kliegl O; Bäuml KH
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Aug; 40(6):861-73. PubMed ID: 22588948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing the effectiveness of cognitive interventions in alleviating accelerated long term forgetting (ALF).
    Ricci M; Wong T; Nikpour A; Miller LA
    Cortex; 2019 Jan; 110():37-46. PubMed ID: 29174307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using cumulative-recall curves to assess the extent of relational and item-specific processing.
    Burns DJ; Hebert T
    Memory; 2005 Feb; 13(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 15847230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of phantom recollection in false recall.
    Marche TA; Brainerd CJ
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Aug; 40(6):902-17. PubMed ID: 22371165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retrieval speeds context fluctuation: why semantic generation enhances later learning but hinders prior learning.
    Divis KM; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1049-62. PubMed ID: 24917050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Influences of recollective experience and self-other differences in episodic retrieval on a following recall test].
    Horiuchi T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2004 Jun; 75(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 15747546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of encoding manipulations on the dynamics of free recall.
    Unsworth N
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 25030080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing the primary and convergent retrieval model of recall: Recall practice produces faster recall success but also faster recall failure.
    Hopper WJ; Huber DE
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):816-841. PubMed ID: 30737729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.