66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2216203)
1. Stripping membranes at term: can it safely reduce the incidence of post-term pregnancies?
McColgin SW; Hampton HL; McCaul JF; Howard PR; Andrew ME; Morrison JC
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Oct; 76(4):678-80. PubMed ID: 2216203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stripping the fetal membranes at term. Is the procedure safe and efficacious?
McColgin SW; Patrissi GA; Morrison JC
J Reprod Med; 1990 Aug; 35(8):811-4. PubMed ID: 2213744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of membrane stripping in prevention of post-term pregnancy: a randomised clinical trial in Ile-lfe, Nigeria.
Dare FO; Oboro VO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 May; 22(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 12521500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study of membrane stripping and nonstripping for induction of labor in uncomplicated term pregnancy.
Tannirandorn Y; Jumrustanasan T
J Med Assoc Thai; 1999 Mar; 82(3):229-33. PubMed ID: 10410476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of membrane sweeping at term pregnancy on duration of pregnancy and labor induction: a randomized trial.
Kashanian M; Akbarian A; Baradaran H; Samiee MM
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2006; 62(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 16534210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stripping of membranes as a safe method to reduce prolonged pregnancies.
Berghella V; Rogers RA; Lescale K
Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jun; 87(6):927-31. PubMed ID: 8649700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Membrane sweeping and prevention of post-term pregnancy in low-risk pregnancies: a randomised controlled trial.
de Miranda E; van der Bom JG; Bonsel GJ; Bleker OP; Rosendaal FR
BJOG; 2006 Apr; 113(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 16489935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk factors for cesarean delivery in preterm, term and post-term patients undergoing induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.
Ennen CS; Bofill JA; Magann EF; Bass JD; Chauhan SP; Morrison JC
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2009; 67(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 18971583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of elective induction of labor with favorable Bishop scores versus expectant management: a randomized clinical trial.
Nielsen PE; Howard BC; Hill CC; Larson PL; Holland RH; Smith PN
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 Jul; 18(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 16105793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outpatient management of the uncomplicated postdate pregnancy with intravaginal prostaglandin E2 gel and membrane stripping.
Doany W; McCarty J
J Matern Fetal Med; 1997; 6(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 9086420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. When to induce labor for post-term? A study of induction at 41 weeks versus 42 weeks.
Fok WY; Chan LY; Tsui MH; Leung TN; Lau TK; Chung TK
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Apr; 125(2):206-10. PubMed ID: 16139416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized controlled trial of acupuncture for initiation of labor in nulliparous women.
Harper TC; Coeytaux RR; Chen W; Campbell K; Kaufman JS; Moise KJ; Thorp JM
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Aug; 19(8):465-70. PubMed ID: 16966110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effectiveness of sweeping membranes at term: a randomized trial.
Crane J; Bennett K; Young D; Windrim R; Kravitz H
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):586-90. PubMed ID: 9083317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Obstetric outcome in post-term pregnancies: time for reappraisal in clinical management.
Hovi M; Raatikainen K; Heiskanen N; Heinonen S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(7):805-9. PubMed ID: 16817077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
Vrouenraets FP; Roumen FJ; Dehing CJ; van den Akker ES; Aarts MJ; Scheve EJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Safety and efficacy of stripping of membranes at term.
Gupta R; Vasishta K; Sawhney H; Ray P
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1998 Feb; 60(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 9509948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Prostaglandins in the induction of labor at term with premature rupture of fetal membranes].
Milasinović L; Vuleta P; Radeka G; Petrović D; Orelj M
Med Pregl; 1997; 50(5-6):175-80. PubMed ID: 9297047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient-administered outpatient intravaginal prostaglandin E2 suppositories in post-date pregnancies: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
Sawai SK; O'Brien WF; Mastrogiannis DS; Krammer J; Mastry MG; Porter GW
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Nov; 84(5):807-10. PubMed ID: 7936516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oral misoprostol for induction of labor in prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) at term: a randomized control trial.
Cheung PC; Yeo EL; Wong KS; Tang LC
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(9):1128-33. PubMed ID: 16929421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
