These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22162106)

  • 1. An efficient and exact approach for detecting trends with binary endpoints.
    Shan G; Ma C; Hutson AD; Wilding GE
    Stat Med; 2012 Jan; 31(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 22162106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing two independent incidence rates using conditional and unconditional exact tests.
    Han C
    Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 17506083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exact one-sided confidence limits for the difference between two correlated proportions.
    Lloyd CJ; Moldovan MV
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3369-84. PubMed ID: 17315269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tests for the homogeneity of two binomial proportions in extremely unbalanced 2 x 2 contingency tables.
    Kang SH; Ahn CW
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(14):2524-35. PubMed ID: 17847031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adaptive extensions of a two-stage group sequential procedure for testing primary and secondary endpoints (I): unknown correlation between the endpoints.
    Tamhane AC; Wu Y; Mehta CR
    Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(19):2027-40. PubMed ID: 22729929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for proportion difference in the presence of incomplete data.
    Tang ML; Ling MH; Tian GL
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 19035467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unconditional tests for comparing two ordered multinomials.
    Shan G; Ma C
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Feb; 25(1):241-54. PubMed ID: 22700600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of exact tests for trend with binary endpoints using Bartholomew's statistic.
    Consiglio JD; Shan G; Wilding GE
    Int J Biostat; 2014; 10(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 25324456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recommended tests for association in 2 x 2 tables.
    Lydersen S; Fagerland MW; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2009 Mar; 28(7):1159-75. PubMed ID: 19170020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Test for the consistency of noninferiority from multiple clinical trials.
    Yan X; Wang MC; Su X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):265-78. PubMed ID: 17365223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Active-control trials with binary data: a comparison of methods for testing superiority or non-inferiority using the odds ratio.
    Siqueira AL; Whitehead A; Todd S
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(3):353-70. PubMed ID: 17628041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confidence interval construction for proportion difference in small-sample paired studies.
    Tang ML; Tang NS; Chan IS
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(23):3565-79. PubMed ID: 16261646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conditional and unconditional confidence intervals following a group sequential test.
    Fan X; DeMets DL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(1):107-22. PubMed ID: 16440840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A note on exact conditional and unconditional tests for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
    Shan G
    Hum Hered; 2013; 76(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 23921792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test procedures.
    Bretz F; Maurer W; Brannath W; Posch M
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):586-604. PubMed ID: 19051220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bootstrap and second-order tests of risk difference.
    Lloyd CJ
    Biometrics; 2010 Sep; 66(3):975-82. PubMed ID: 19912176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing for the existence of a desirable dose combination.
    Hung HM; Chi GY; Lipicky RJ
    Biometrics; 1993 Mar; 49(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 8513112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Power and sample size when multiple endpoints are considered.
    Senn S; Bretz F
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):161-70. PubMed ID: 17674404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Partition testing in dose-response studies with multiple endpoints.
    Liu Y; Hsu J; Ruberg S
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):181-92. PubMed ID: 17654696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of stratified and adjusted trend tests for binomial proportions.
    Leuraud K; Benichou J
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):529-35. PubMed ID: 16025544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.