These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22162621)

  • 1. Prediction with measurement errors in finite populations.
    Singer JM; Stanek EJ; Lencina VB; González LM; Li W; Martino SS
    Stat Probab Lett; 2012 Feb; 82(2):332-339. PubMed ID: 22162621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting Random Effects with an Expanded Finite Population Mixed Model.
    Stanek EJ; Singer JM
    J Stat Plan Inference; 2008 Oct; 138(10):2991-3004. PubMed ID: 19802323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Usage of an SNP-SNP Relationship Matrix for Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP) Analysis Using a Community-Based Cohort Study.
    Lee YS; Kim HJ; Cho S; Kim H
    Genomics Inform; 2014 Dec; 12(4):254-60. PubMed ID: 25705167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An alternative derivation method of mixed model equations from best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) and restricted BLUP of breeding values not using maximum likelihood.
    Satoh M
    Anim Sci J; 2018 Jun; 89(6):876-879. PubMed ID: 29687542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of Balanced Two-Stage Empirical Predictors of Realized Cluster Latent Values from Finite Populations: A Simulation Study.
    Martino SS; Singer JM; Stanek EJ
    Comput Stat Data Anal; 2008 Jan; 52(4):2199-2217. PubMed ID: 18283330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of nitrogen excretion equations for ryegrass pasture-fed dairy cows.
    Christodoulou C; Moorby JM; Tsiplakou E; Kantas D; Foskolos A
    Animal; 2021 Sep; 15(9):100311. PubMed ID: 34416555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detecting effective starting point of genomic selection by divergent trends from best linear unbiased prediction and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in pigs, beef cattle, and broilers.
    Abdollahi-Arpanahi R; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Sep; 99(9):. PubMed ID: 34390341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of restricted maximum likelihood and method R for estimating heritability and predicting breeding value under selection.
    Cantet RJ; Birchmeier AN; Santos-Cristal MG; de Avila VS
    J Anim Sci; 2000 Oct; 78(10):2554-60. PubMed ID: 11048920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why not routinely use best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs) as estimates of cholesterol, per cent fat from kcal and physical activity?
    Stanek EJ; Well A; Ockene I
    Stat Med; 1999 Nov; 18(21):2943-59. PubMed ID: 10523752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of finite population parameters with auxiliary information and response error.
    González LM; Singer JM; Stanek EJ
    J Stat Theory Pract; 2014 Oct; 8(4):772-791. PubMed ID: 25089123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adapting best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) for timely genetic evaluation: I. Progeny traits in a single contemporary group for each sex.
    Harris DL; Lofgren DL; Stewart TS; Schinckel AP
    J Anim Sci; 1989 Dec; 67(12):3209-22. PubMed ID: 2613570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genomic prediction of breeding values using previously estimated SNP variances.
    Calus MP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):52. PubMed ID: 25928875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simultaneous fitting of genomic-BLUP and Bayes-C components in a genomic prediction model.
    Iheshiulor OOM; Woolliams JA; Svendsen M; Solberg T; Meuwissen THE
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):63. PubMed ID: 28836944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Functional Mixed Effects Model for Small Area Estimation.
    Maiti T; Sinha S; Zhong PS
    Scand Stat Theory Appl; 2016 Sep; 43(3):886-903. PubMed ID: 27795610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicted Residual Error Sum of Squares of Mixed Models: An Application for Genomic Prediction.
    Xu S
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Mar; 7(3):895-909. PubMed ID: 28108552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of a genetic relationship matrix biases the best linear unbiased prediction.
    Kim B
    J Genet; 2020; 99():. PubMed ID: 33168790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.
    Muir WM
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):342-55. PubMed ID: 18076471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of index selection and best linear unbiased prediction for simulated layer poultry data.
    Jeyaruban MG; Gibson JP; Gowe RS
    Poult Sci; 1995 Oct; 74(10):1566-76. PubMed ID: 8559719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selection on individual phenotype and best linear unbiased predictor of breeding value in a closed swine herd.
    Belonsky GM; Kennedy BW
    J Anim Sci; 1988 May; 66(5):1124-31. PubMed ID: 3397339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genome-wide Association Study (GWAS) and Its Application for Improving the Genomic Estimated Breeding Values (GEBV) of the Berkshire Pork Quality Traits.
    Lee YS; Jeong H; Taye M; Kim HJ; Ka S; Ryu YC; Cho S
    Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2015 Nov; 28(11):1551-7. PubMed ID: 26580278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.