280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22163013)
1. Quantifying the spatial ecology of wide-ranging marine species in the Gulf of California: implications for marine conservation planning.
Anadón JD; D'Agrosa C; Gondor A; Gerber LR
PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e28400. PubMed ID: 22163013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Larval dispersal and movement patterns of coral reef fishes, and implications for marine reserve network design.
Green AL; Maypa AP; Almany GR; Rhodes KL; Weeks R; Abesamis RA; Gleason MG; Mumby PJ; White AT
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2015 Nov; 90(4):1215-47. PubMed ID: 25423947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Designing connected marine reserves in the face of global warming.
Álvarez-Romero JG; Munguía-Vega A; Beger M; Del Mar Mancha-Cisneros M; Suárez-Castillo AN; Gurney GG; Pressey RL; Gerber LR; Morzaria-Luna HN; Reyes-Bonilla H; Adams VM; Kolb M; Graham EM; VanDerWal J; Castillo-López A; Hinojosa-Arango G; Petatán-Ramírez D; Moreno-Baez M; Godínez-Reyes CR; Torre J
Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Feb; 24(2):e671-e691. PubMed ID: 29274104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hydroids (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) from Mauritanian Coral Mounds.
Gil M; Ramil F; AgÍs JA
Zootaxa; 2020 Nov; 4878(3):zootaxa.4878.3.2. PubMed ID: 33311142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adaptive management of the Great Barrier Reef: a globally significant demonstration of the benefits of networks of marine reserves.
McCook LJ; Ayling T; Cappo M; Choat JH; Evans RD; De Freitas DM; Heupel M; Hughes TP; Jones GP; Mapstone B; Marsh H; Mills M; Molloy FJ; Pitcher CR; Pressey RL; Russ GR; Sutton S; Sweatman H; Tobin R; Wachenfeld DR; Williamson DH
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Oct; 107(43):18278-85. PubMed ID: 20176947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An approach to incorporating inferred connectivity of adult movement into marine protected area design with limited data.
Friesen SK; Martone R; Rubidge E; Baggio JA; Ban NC
Ecol Appl; 2019 Jun; 29(4):e01890. PubMed ID: 30929286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A synthesis of genetic connectivity in deep-sea fauna and implications for marine reserve design.
Baco AR; Etter RJ; Ribeiro PA; von der Heyden S; Beerli P; Kinlan BP
Mol Ecol; 2016 Jul; 25(14):3276-98. PubMed ID: 27146215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Large recovery of fish biomass in a no-take marine reserve.
Aburto-Oropeza O; Erisman B; Galland GR; Mascareñas-Osorio I; Sala E; Ezcurra E
PLoS One; 2011; 6(8):e23601. PubMed ID: 21858183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. β-diversity reveals ecological connectivity patterns underlying marine community recovery: Implications for conservation.
Bevilacqua S; Boero F; De Leo F; Guarnieri G; Mačić V; Benedetti-Cecchi L; Terlizzi A; Fraschetti S
Ecol Appl; 2023 Jul; 33(5):e2867. PubMed ID: 37114630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incorporating conservation zone effectiveness for protecting biodiversity in marine planning.
Makino A; Klein CJ; Beger M; Jupiter SD; Possingham HP
PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e78986. PubMed ID: 24223870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ecosystem-based analysis of a marine protected area where fisheries and protected species coexist.
Espinoza-Tenorio A; Montaño-Moctezuma G; Espejel I
Environ Manage; 2010 Apr; 45(4):739-50. PubMed ID: 20204634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A general model for designing networks of marine reserves.
Sala E; Aburto-Oropeza O; Paredes G; Parra I; Barrera JC; Dayton PK
Science; 2002 Dec; 298(5600):1991-3. PubMed ID: 12471258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increased connectivity and depth improve the effectiveness of marine reserves.
Goetze JS; Wilson S; Radford B; Fisher R; Langlois TJ; Monk J; Knott NA; Malcolm H; Currey-Randall LM; Ierodiaconou D; Harasti D; Barrett N; Babcock RC; Bosch NE; Brock D; Claudet J; Clough J; Fairclough DV; Heupel MR; Holmes TH; Huveneers C; Jordan AR; McLean D; Meekan M; Miller D; Newman SJ; Rees MJ; Roberts KE; Saunders BJ; Speed CW; Travers MJ; Treml E; Whitmarsh SK; Wakefield CB; Harvey ES
Glob Chang Biol; 2021 Aug; 27(15):3432-3447. PubMed ID: 34015863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Uniting paradigms of connectivity in marine ecology.
Brown CJ; Harborne AR; Paris CB; Mumby PJ
Ecology; 2016 Sep; 97(9):2447-2457. PubMed ID: 27859092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incorporating biogeography into evaluations of the Channel Islands marine reserve network.
Hamilton SL; Caselle JE; Malone DP; Carr MH
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Oct; 107(43):18272-7. PubMed ID: 20176956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Incorporating surrogate species and seascape connectivity to improve marine conservation outcomes.
Olds AD; Connolly RM; Pitt KA; Maxwell PS; Aswani S; Albert S
Conserv Biol; 2014 Aug; 28(4):982-91. PubMed ID: 24527964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the current state of ecological connectivity in a large marine protected area system.
Roberts KE; Cook CN; Beher J; Treml EA
Conserv Biol; 2021 Apr; 35(2):699-710. PubMed ID: 32623761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of marine protected areas in the Philippines for biodiversity conservation.
Weeks R; Russ GR; Alcala AC; White AT
Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):531-40. PubMed ID: 19843129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incorporating seascape connectivity in conservation prioritisation.
Weeks R
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0182396. PubMed ID: 28753647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Understanding the distribution of marine megafauna in the English channel region: identifying key habitats for conservation within the busiest seaway on earth.
McClellan CM; Brereton T; Dell'Amico F; Johns DG; Cucknell AC; Patrick SC; Penrose R; Ridoux V; Solandt JL; Stephan E; Votier SC; Williams R; Godley BJ
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89720. PubMed ID: 24586985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
