These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22164706)

  • 41. Trust, the asymmetry principle, and the role of prior beliefs.
    Poortinga W; Pidgeon NF
    Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1475-86. PubMed ID: 15660605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Consumer acceptance of biotechnology and the role of second generation technologies in the USA and Europe.
    Lusk JL; Rozan A
    Trends Biotechnol; 2005 Aug; 23(8):386-7. PubMed ID: 15953650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Attitudes to genetically modified food over time: How trust in organizations and the media cycle predict support.
    Marques MD; Critchley CR; Walshe J
    Public Underst Sci; 2015 Jul; 24(5):601-18. PubMed ID: 25063421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. How Japanese students reason about agricultural biotechnology.
    Maekawa F; Macer D
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2004 Oct; 10(4):705-16. PubMed ID: 15586729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Fogging to combat dengue: factors influencing stakeholders' attitudes in Malaysia.
    Arham AF; Amin L; Mustapa MAC; Mahadi Z; Yaacob M; Wasli MMP; Rusly NS
    BMC Public Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):1140. PubMed ID: 37312081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. An empirical test of competing theories of hazard-related trust: the case of GM food.
    Allum N
    Risk Anal; 2007 Aug; 27(4):935-46. PubMed ID: 17958502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Psychosocial and cultural factors affecting the perceived risk of genetically modified food: an overview of the literature.
    Finucane ML; Holup JL
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 Apr; 60(7):1603-12. PubMed ID: 15652691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Trials, tribulations and diversification.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Dec; 21(12):1411. PubMed ID: 14647307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Conflict of interest from a Romanian geneticist's perspective.
    Ispas I
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2002 Jul; 8(3):363-81. PubMed ID: 12353364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. An Asian perspective on GMO and biotechnology issues.
    Teng PP
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():237-40. PubMed ID: 18296345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. GM crops in Africa: challenges in Egypt.
    Abdallah N
    GM Crops; 2010; 1(3):116-9. PubMed ID: 21844668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A Shift Towards Biotechnology: Social Opinion in the EU.
    Woźniak E; Tyczewska A; Twardowski T
    Trends Biotechnol; 2021 Mar; 39(3):214-218. PubMed ID: 32896439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Transparent communication strategy on GMOs: will it change public opinion?
    Sinemus K; Egelhofer M
    Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1141-6. PubMed ID: 17703492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Attitudes towards genetically modified and organic foods.
    Saher M; Lindeman M; Hursti UK
    Appetite; 2006 May; 46(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 16546293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Stakeholders' attitudes to outdoor residual spraying technique for dengue control in Malaysia: A PLS-SEM approach.
    Arham AF; Amin L; Mustapa MAC; Mahadi Z; Yaacob M; Ibrahim M
    PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2021 Jun; 15(6):e0009493. PubMed ID: 34185785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The emerging international regulatory framework for biotechnology.
    Komen J
    GM Crops Food; 2012; 3(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 22430851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A turning point in Johannesburg?
    Giddings V
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Nov; 20(11):1081. PubMed ID: 12410246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Introduction to the GM crops special issue on biosafety, food and GM regulation.
    McHughen A
    GM Crops Food; 2012; 3(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 22614635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Advocacy Science: Explaining the Term with Case Studies from Biotechnology.
    Gerasimova K
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Apr; 24(2):455-477. PubMed ID: 28597219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. No Munich on GM crops.
    Malvoisin P; Grausz JD
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Dec; 22(12):1501; discussion 1501. PubMed ID: 15583648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.