These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22166182)

  • 1. Quality of information sources about mental disorders: a comparison of Wikipedia with centrally controlled web and printed sources.
    Reavley NJ; Mackinnon AJ; Morgan AJ; Alvarez-Jimenez M; Hetrick SE; Killackey E; Nelson B; Purcell R; Yap MB; Jorm AF
    Psychol Med; 2012 Aug; 42(8):1753-62. PubMed ID: 22166182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of Internet information in pediatric otolaryngology: a comparison of three most referenced websites.
    Volsky PG; Baldassari CM; Mushti S; Derkay CS
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 76(9):1312-6. PubMed ID: 22770592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy and completeness of drug information in Wikipedia: a comparison with standard textbooks of pharmacology.
    Kräenbring J; Monzon Penza T; Gutmann J; Muehlich S; Zolk O; Wojnowski L; Maas R; Engelhardt S; Sarikas A
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e106930. PubMed ID: 25250889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality and content of internet-based information on temporomandibular disorders.
    Park MW; Jo JH; Park JW
    J Orofac Pain; 2012; 26(4):296-306. PubMed ID: 23110269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating internet health resources in ear, nose, and throat surgery.
    Goslin RA; Elhassan HA
    Laryngoscope; 2013 Jul; 123(7):1626-31. PubMed ID: 23720201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Completeness, accuracy, and readability of Wikipedia as a reference for patient medication information.
    Candelario DM; Vazquez V; Jackson W; Reilly T
    J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2017; 57(2):197-200.e1. PubMed ID: 28139458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The sources and popularity of online drug information: an analysis of top search engine results and web page views.
    Law MR; Mintzes B; Morgan SG
    Ann Pharmacother; 2011 Mar; 45(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 21343404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. HON label and DISCERN as content quality indicators of health-related websites.
    Khazaal Y; Chatton A; Zullino D; Khan R
    Psychiatr Q; 2012 Mar; 83(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 21547515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of gastroenterology and hepatology articles on Wikipedia: are they suitable as learning resources for medical students?
    Azer SA
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Feb; 26(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 24276492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Readability of consumer health information on the internet: a comparison of U.S. government-funded and commercially funded websites.
    Risoldi Cochrane Z; Gregory P; Wilson A
    J Health Commun; 2012; 17(9):1003-10. PubMed ID: 22512714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of Web-based information on depression.
    Zermatten A; Khazaal Y; Coquard O; Chatton A; Bondolfi G
    Depress Anxiety; 2010 Sep; 27(9):852-8. PubMed ID: 20099271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient-oriented methotrexate information sites on the Internet: a review of completeness, accuracy, format, reliability, credibility, and readability.
    Thompson AE; Graydon SL
    J Rheumatol; 2009 Jan; 36(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 19004031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Readability of online health information: implications for health literacy.
    McInnes N; Haglund BJ
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2011 Dec; 36(4):173-89. PubMed ID: 21332302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality of eating disorders websites: what adolescents and their families need to know.
    Smith AT; Kelly-Weeder S; Engel J; McGowan KA; Anderson B; Wolfe BE
    J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs; 2011 Feb; 24(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 21272113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The quality of internet-sourced information for patients with chronic pain is poor.
    Corcoran TB; Haigh F; Seabrook A; Schug SA
    Clin J Pain; 2009 Sep; 25(7):617-23. PubMed ID: 19692804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Survey of quality, readability, and social reach of websites on osteosarcoma in adolescents.
    Lam CG; Roter DL; Cohen KJ
    Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Jan; 90(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 22959332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Quality of health information about epilepsy on the Internet: Evaluation of French websites].
    Auvin S; Dupont S
    Rev Neurol (Paris); 2013 Mar; 169(3):234-9. PubMed ID: 23067876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A study of undue pain and surfing: using hierarchical criteria to assess website quality.
    Lorence D; Abraham J
    Health Informatics J; 2008 Sep; 14(3):155-73. PubMed ID: 18775823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality and readability of online patient information for abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Bailey MA; Coughlin PA; Sohrabi S; Griffin KJ; Rashid ST; Troxler MA; Scott DJ
    J Vasc Surg; 2012 Jul; 56(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 22521801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wikipedia as an evidence source for nursing and healthcare students.
    Haigh CA
    Nurse Educ Today; 2011 Feb; 31(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 20646799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.