188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22166331)
1. Evaluation of preoperative bioimpedance spectroscopy quantification of body composition on predicting postoperative outcomes following robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Badalato GM; Wosnitzer MS; Truesdale MD; Sandri M; Ko WJ; Landman J; Badani KK
Can J Urol; 2011 Dec; 18(6):6031-6. PubMed ID: 22166331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical and oncological outcomes in patients with a preoperative PSA value <4 ng/ml undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Zugor V; Labanaris AP; Bauer RM; Witt JH
Anticancer Res; 2012 May; 32(5):2079-83. PubMed ID: 22593492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does body mass index "dilute" the predictive property of prostate-specific antigen for tumor volume at radical prostatectomy?
Mitchell CR; Umbreit EC; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Karnes RJ
Urology; 2011 Oct; 78(4):868-72. PubMed ID: 21843902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of obesity on the utility of preoperative prostate-specific antigen velocity to predict for relapse after prostatectomy: a report from the SEARCH database.
King CR; Freedland SJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Aronson WJ; Presti JC
Urology; 2007 May; 69(5):921-6. PubMed ID: 17482935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stepwise approach for nerve sparing without countertraction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: technique and outcomes.
Kowalczyk KJ; Huang AC; Hevelone ND; Lipsitz SR; Yu HY; Ulmer WD; Kaplan JR; Patel S; Nguyen PL; Hu JC
Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):536-47. PubMed ID: 21620561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Total body water changes after an exercise intervention tracked using bioimpedance spectroscopy: a deuterium oxide comparison.
Moon JR; Smith AE; Tobkin SE; Lockwood CM; Kendall KL; Graef JL; Roberts MD; Dalbo VJ; Kerksick CM; Cramer JT; Beck TW; Stout JR
Clin Nutr; 2009 Oct; 28(5):516-25. PubMed ID: 19500888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved biochemical outcome with adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with poor pathologic features.
Vargas C; Kestin LL; Weed DW; Krauss D; Vicini FA; Martinez AA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):714-24. PubMed ID: 15708249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sex hormone-binding globulin is a significant predictor of extracapsular extension in men undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Salonia A; Gallina A; Briganti A; Zanni G; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Colombo R; Bertini R; Freschi M; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2011 Apr; 107(8):1243-9. PubMed ID: 20883480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes.
Atug F; Castle EP; Srivastav SK; Burgess SV; Thomas R; Davis R
Eur Urol; 2006 May; 49(5):866-71; discussion 871-2. PubMed ID: 16564614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of variations in bony pelvic dimensions on performing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Hong SK; Chang IH; Han BK; Yu JH; Han JH; Jeong SJ; Jeong H; Byun SS; Lee HJ; Lee SE
Urology; 2007 May; 69(5):907-11. PubMed ID: 17482932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients.
Mikhail AA; Stockton BR; Orvieto MA; Chien GW; Gong EM; Zorn KC; Brendler CB; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL
Urology; 2006 Apr; 67(4):774-9. PubMed ID: 16566979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Body fat and fat-free mass measured by bioelectric impedance spectroscopy and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in obese and non-obese adults.
Berstad P; Randby A; Seim Ekeland G; Ulveland H; Omland T; Almendingen K
Br J Nutr; 2012 Apr; 107(8):1192-200. PubMed ID: 21878141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men ≥75 years of age. Surgical, oncological and functional outcomes.
Labanaris AP; Witt JH; Zugor V
Anticancer Res; 2012 May; 32(5):2085-9. PubMed ID: 22593493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical perineal prostatectomy.
Goetzl MA; Krebill R; Griebling TL; Thrasher JB
Can J Urol; 2009 Apr; 16(2):4553-7. PubMed ID: 19364427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pre-operative percent free PSA predicts clinical outcomes in patients treated with radical prostatectomy with total PSA levels below 10 ng/ml.
Shariat SF; Abdel-Aziz KF; Roehrborn CG; Lotan Y
Eur Urol; 2006 Feb; 49(2):293-302. PubMed ID: 16387412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robot assisted radical prostatectomy for elderly patients with high risk prostate cancer.
Rogers CG; Sammon JD; Sukumar S; Diaz M; Peabody J; Menon M
Urol Oncol; 2013 Feb; 31(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 21803614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prostate weight: an independent predictor for positive surgical margins during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Msezane LP; Gofrit ON; Lin S; Shalhav AL; Zagaja GP; Zorn KC
Can J Urol; 2007 Oct; 14(5):3697-701. PubMed ID: 17949525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
