These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2216647)

  • 1. Redundancy phenomena are affected by response requirements.
    Grice GR; Canham L
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Sep; 48(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 2216647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What makes targets redundant?
    Grice GR; Reed JM
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 May; 51(5):437-42. PubMed ID: 1594433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Processing redundant signals: coactivation, divided attention, or what?
    Eriksen CW; Goettl B; St James JD; Fournier LR
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Apr; 45(4):356-70. PubMed ID: 2710636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coactivation in the perception of redundant targets.
    Fournier LR; Eriksen CW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Aug; 16(3):538-50. PubMed ID: 2144569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How much processing do nonattended stimuli receive? Apparently very little, but...
    Eriksen CW; Webb JM; Fournier LR
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 May; 47(5):477-88. PubMed ID: 2349060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of category identity on letter matching: conceptual penetration of visual processing or response competition?
    Chen J; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 May; 74(4):716-29. PubMed ID: 22231606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the locus of redundancy effects in a letter-detection task.
    Rueckl JG; Suzuki S; Yeh SL
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 May; 49(5):412-21. PubMed ID: 2057307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Absence of distracting information explains the redundant signals effect for a centrally presented categorization task.
    Mishler AD; Neider MB
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Nov; 181():18-26. PubMed ID: 29028518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recognition of rotated letters: extracting invariance across successive and simultaneous stimuli.
    Koriat A; Norman J; Kimchi R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 May; 17(2):444-57. PubMed ID: 1830087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of location cuing on redundant-target processing.
    Theeuwes J
    Psychol Res; 1994; 57(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 7824681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional distribution in the visual field during same-different judgments as assessed by response competition.
    Pan K; Eriksen CW
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Feb; 53(2):134-44. PubMed ID: 8433911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: a psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow.
    Smid HG; Mulder G; Mulder LJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Aug; 74(2-3):169-201. PubMed ID: 2251928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing a queue hypothesis for the processing of global and local information.
    Navon D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1991 Jun; 120(2):173-89. PubMed ID: 1830610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence against response bias in temporal order tasks with attention manipulation by masked primes.
    Scharlau I
    Psychol Res; 2004 Aug; 68(4):224-36. PubMed ID: 12827351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Redundancy gains in simple responses and go/no-go tasks.
    Gondan M; Götze C; Greenlee MW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1692-709. PubMed ID: 20675811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Where similarity beats redundancy: the importance of context, higher order similarity, and response assignment.
    Eidels A; Townsend JT; Pomerantz JR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1441-63. PubMed ID: 19045985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of action on visual search: behavioral response toward stimuli modifies the selection process.
    Buttaccio DR; Hahn S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1453-66. PubMed ID: 21491163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inhibition of return in subliminal letter priming.
    Marzouki Y; Grainger J; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 18582840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adult age differences in attention: filtering or selection?
    Allen PA; Weber TA; Madden DJ
    J Gerontol; 1994 Sep; 49(5):P213-22. PubMed ID: 8056946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Redundancy gain in binocular rivalry.
    Ritchie KL; Bannerman RL; Sahraie A
    Perception; 2014; 43(12):1316-28. PubMed ID: 25669049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.