109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2216680)
21. But they're not legal! or "The Living Will Song".
Town J
N J Nurse; 1991; 21(3):8. PubMed ID: 2047208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Termination of life-sustaining medical treatment: who should exercise a patient's right to die?
Denbo SM
Health Care Superv; 1994 Jun; 12(4):60-72. PubMed ID: 10134143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Whistle-blowing by nurses: a matter of ethics.
Fry ST
Nurs Outlook; 1989; 37(1):56. PubMed ID: 2911497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Legal revisions in the area of assisted death].
Verrel T
Chirurg; 1996 Jun; 67(6):Suppl 133-6. PubMed ID: 8767095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Dying by the rules. Legal decisions at the end of life.
Burke FA
N C Med J; 1996; 57(6):386-9. PubMed ID: 8937166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Indiana's living will after Cruzan.
Nocon JJ
Indiana Med; 1990 Nov; 83(11):832-4. PubMed ID: 2262676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Learning from the Cruzan decision: the need for advance directives.
Cantor MD
JAMA; 1991 Apr; 265(13):1751, 1754. PubMed ID: 2002582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Man wins battle to keep receiving life support: pro-choice living wills are essential.
Irwin MH
BMJ; 2004 Aug; 329(7464):515. PubMed ID: 15331491
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Decisions at the end of life: implications following Cruzan.
Kyba FN
Tex Nurs; 1991 Feb; 65(2):13-4, 16. PubMed ID: 1998169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Health care ethics--living-will legislation opposed: Massachusetts.
Harrington T
CHAC Rev; 1980; 8(3):22-3. PubMed ID: 10247852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Living wills: guidance for nurses.
Nurs Stand; 1992 Jan 15-21; 6(17):39. PubMed ID: 1540509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Ethics: codes or no codes?
Hull RT
Kans Nurse; 1980 Nov; 55(10):8, 18-21. PubMed ID: 6904684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Perspectives. Living will concept boosted by Cruzan ruling.
Olson EG
Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1990 Jul; 44(28):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10105409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The Patient Self-Determination Act: benefit or burden?
Moss AH
W V Med J; 1991 Nov; 87(11):510-3. PubMed ID: 1819875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Ohio's new living will legislation.
Ohio Med; 1991 Jul; 87(7):321-2. PubMed ID: 1870829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Advance directives and treatment withdrawal. Legal considerations.
Dewar MA
J Fla Med Assoc; 1994 Jan; 81(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 8133230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The EMT and the living will.
Appleton W
Emerg Med Serv; 1989 Apr; 18(3):44, 51-3. PubMed ID: 10324960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. After the supreme court judgment on autonomy: What the oncologist needs to know.
Gursahani R; Simha SN; Mani RK
Indian J Cancer; 2018; 55(3):207-209. PubMed ID: 30693879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Beyond Cruzan: making life support decisions.
Anderson KM; Byrne FD; Robinson RD
Indiana Med; 1990 Nov; 83(11):838-41. PubMed ID: 2262678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Compelling pregnancy at death's door.
Taylor KA
Columbia J Gend Law; 1997; 7(1):85-165. PubMed ID: 16184655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
