142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22167447)
1. How to optimize excisional procedures for the treatment of CIN? The role of colposcopy.
Grisot C; Mancini J; Giusiano S; Houvenaeghel G; Agostini A; d'Ercole C; Boubli L; Prendiville W; Carcopino X
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 May; 285(5):1383-90. PubMed ID: 22167447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Direct colposcopic vision used with the LLETZ procedure for optimal treatment of CIN: results of joint cohort studies.
Carcopino X; Mancini J; Charpin C; Grisot C; Maycock JA; Houvenaeghel G; Agostini A; Boubli L; Prendiville W
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Nov; 288(5):1087-94. PubMed ID: 23670207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment failure following excision therapy of CIN: the impact of direct colposcopic vision during procedure.
Heineman M; Mancini J; Villeret J; Agostini A; Houvenaeghel G; Boubli L; Carcopino X
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):825-31. PubMed ID: 26404447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Small lesion size measured by colposcopy may predict absence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a large loop excision of the transformation zone specimen.
Munmany M; Marimon L; Cardona M; Nonell R; Juiz M; Astudillo R; Ordi J; Torné A; Del Pino M
BJOG; 2017 Feb; 124(3):495-502. PubMed ID: 27506510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive factors for residual disease in the uterine cervix after large loop excision of the transformation zone in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.
Hamontri S; Israngura N; Rochanawutanon M; Bullangpoti S; Tangtrakul S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Feb; 93 Suppl 2():S74-80. PubMed ID: 21299083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Secondary excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: an evaluation of two treatment methods.
Bowring J; Tulloch I; Phadnis SV; Young MP; Evans H; Walker P
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(5):511-4. PubMed ID: 20604658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective evaluation of "see and treat" in women with HSIL Pap smear results: is this an appropriate strategy?
Numnum TM; Kirby TO; Leath CA; Huh WK; Alvarez RD; Straughn JM
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2005 Jan; 9(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 15870514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-infected women.
Foulot H; Heard I; Potard V; Costagliola D; Chapron C
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Dec; 141(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 18760524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The volume perspective: a comparison of two excisional treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (laser versus LLETZ).
Phadnis SV; Atilade A; Young MP; Evans H; Walker PG
BJOG; 2010 Apr; 117(5):615-9. PubMed ID: 20156211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The borderline cervical smear: colposcopic and biopsy outcome.
al-Nafussi A; Rebello G; al-Yusif R; McGoogan E
J Clin Pathol; 2000 Jun; 53(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 10911801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 'See and treat' electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone.
Ferris DG; Hainer BL; Pfenninger JL; Zuber TJ
J Fam Pract; 1996 Mar; 42(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 8636676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Appropriate cone dimensions to achieve negative excision margins after large loop excision of transformation zone in the uterine cervix for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Papoutsis D; Rodolakis A; Mesogitis S; Sotiropoulou M; Antsaklis A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 75(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 23296191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study of two methods of large loop excision of the transformation zone.
Mossa MA; Carter PG; Abdu S; Young MP; Thomas VA; Barton DP
BJOG; 2005 Apr; 112(4):490-4. PubMed ID: 15777450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors factors of the absence of high-grade intraepithelial lesion in excisional therapy specimen.
Morello L; Mancini J; Carcopino X
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2023 Apr; 52(4):102550. PubMed ID: 36773647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of age and cone dimensions on cervical regeneration: an Italian multicentric prospective observational study.
Ciavattini A; Delli Carpini G; Moriconi L; Clemente N; Montik N; De Vincenzo R; Del Fabro A; Buttignol M; Ricci C; Moro F; Sopracordevole F
BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e020675. PubMed ID: 29555794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. "See and treat" approach is appropriate in women with high-grade lesions on either cervical cytology or colposcopy.
Aue-Aungkul A; Punyawatanasin S; Natprathan A; Srisomboon J; Kietpeerakool C
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(7):1723-6. PubMed ID: 22126552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [How are excisional therapies for CIN performed in France? A national audit].
Einaudi L; Boubli L; Carcopino X
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2015 May; 44(5):403-10. PubMed ID: 25434726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A multicentric randomized study comparing two techniques of magnification assisted loop excision of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: video exoscopy and colposcopy.
Vercellino GF; Erdemoglu E; Chiantera V; Malak AH; Vasiljeva K; Drechsler I; Dückelmann AM; Richter J; Schneider A; Böhmer G
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 289(6):1301-7. PubMed ID: 24370959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evidence supporting see-and-treat management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ebisch RM; Rovers MM; Bosgraaf RP; van der Pluijm-Schouten HW; Melchers WJ; van den Akker PA; Massuger LF; Bekkers RL
BJOG; 2016 Jan; 123(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 26177672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
