These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22168241)

  • 1. Mycoses. Editorial.
    Mickus K
    Mycoses; 2012 Jan; 55(1):1. PubMed ID: 22168241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical Mycology. Editorial.
    Salkin IF
    Med Mycol; 2012 Jan; 50(1):1. PubMed ID: 22172003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On editorial practice and peer review.
    Shahar E
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Aug; 13(4):699-701. PubMed ID: 17683318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Editorial policy: industry funding and editorial independence.
    MacDonald N; Downie J
    CMAJ; 2006 Jun; 174(13):1817, 1819. PubMed ID: 16785448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. EIC editorial-27:4.
    Chapple C
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(4):263. PubMed ID: 18404620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Journal editorial policies, animal welfare, and the 3Rs.
    Osborne NJ; Payne D; Newman ML
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Dec; 9(12):55-9. PubMed ID: 20013503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The editorial process].
    Rosenberg J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Nov; 170(48):3933. PubMed ID: 19087728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peering into peer-review.
    Helton ML; Balistreri WF
    J Pediatr; 2011 Jul; 159(1):150-1. PubMed ID: 21429510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Developing new peer reviewers: tips for editors.
    Ohler L
    Nurse Author Ed; 2005; 15(4):7-9. PubMed ID: 16350891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry editorial policies and ethical guidelines.
    Roth KA
    J Histochem Cytochem; 2006 Feb; 54(2):129-30. PubMed ID: 16418501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer review and the nursing literature.
    Dougherty MC
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):73. PubMed ID: 19289927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In praise of peer reviewers and the peer review process.
    Peternelj-Taylor C
    J Forensic Nurs; 2010; 6(4):159-61. PubMed ID: 21114756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [It smells! 2].
    Engberg M; Christensen B; Karlsmose B; Lauritzen T; Lous J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Mar; 165(11):1148-9. PubMed ID: 12677997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response to open peer commentaries on "Journal editorial policies, animal welfare, and the 3Rs".
    Osborne NJ; Payne D; Newman ML
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Dec; 9(12):W3. PubMed ID: 20013483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Brain. Editorial.
    Compston A
    Brain; 2011 Sep; 134(Pt 9):2441-3. PubMed ID: 21908870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Format, style, and precision.
    Froman RD
    Res Nurs Health; 2011 Feb; 34(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 21243654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [It smells!].
    Bundgaard S
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jan; 165(2):141-2. PubMed ID: 12553101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Suggesting reviewers.
    Carmichael SW; Agur AM; Seifert MF; Spinner RJ; Tubbs RS; McDonald S; Nicholson H; Lachman N
    Clin Anat; 2006 Jan; 19(1):1. PubMed ID: 16342266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Challenges faced by editors.
    Winter EM
    J Sports Sci; 2011 Feb; 29(4):327-8. PubMed ID: 21259153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Editorial: thoughts on establishing research significance and preserving scientific integrity.
    Drotar D
    J Pediatr Psychol; 2008; 33(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 17977891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.