109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22168459)
1. Validation of a new assessment tool for qualitative research articles.
Schou L; Høstrup H; Lyngsø EE; Larsen S; Poulsen I
J Adv Nurs; 2012 Sep; 68(9):2086-94. PubMed ID: 22168459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reviewing studies with diverse designs: the development and evaluation of a new tool.
Sirriyeh R; Lawton R; Gardner P; Armitage G
J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Aug; 18(4):746-52. PubMed ID: 21410846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Quality control and assessment of qualitative interview in health care research].
Xie YM; Liao X
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2008 Jul; 6(7):668-73. PubMed ID: 18601845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the effects of using the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool versus informal appraisal in assessing health research: a randomised trial.
Crowe M; Sheppard L; Campbell A
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2011 Dec; 9(4):444-9. PubMed ID: 22093394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interrater reliability in assessing quality of diagnostic accuracy studies using the QUADAS tool. A preliminary assessment.
Hollingworth W; Medina LS; Lenkinski RE; Shibata DK; Bernal B; Zurakowski D; Comstock B; Jarvik JG
Acad Radiol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):803-10. PubMed ID: 16777553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability assessments in qualitative health promotion research.
Cook KE
Health Promot Int; 2012 Mar; 27(1):90-101. PubMed ID: 21558285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.
Groenvold M
Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4184. PubMed ID: 20816024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research.
Daly J; Willis K; Small R; Green J; Welch N; Kealy M; Hughes E
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 60(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 17161753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The development of a quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL).
Lucas NP; Macaskill P; Irwig L; Bogduk N
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 63(8):854-61. PubMed ID: 20056381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative analysis of three online appraisal instruments' ability to assess validity in qualitative research.
Hannes K; Lockwood C; Pearson A
Qual Health Res; 2010 Dec; 20(12):1736-43. PubMed ID: 20671302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
Allen D; Rixson L
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: reasserting realism in qualitative research.
Porter S
J Adv Nurs; 2007 Oct; 60(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 17824942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical instruments: reliability and validity critical appraisal.
Brink Y; Louw QA
J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Dec; 18(6):1126-32. PubMed ID: 21689217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Home Falls and Accidents Screening Tool.
Vu TV; Mackenzie L
Aust Occup Ther J; 2012 Jun; 59(3):235-42. PubMed ID: 22690774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Reconsidering evaluation criteria regarding health care research: toward an integrative framework of quantitative and qualitative criteria].
Miyata H; Kai I
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2006 May; 53(5):319-28. PubMed ID: 16813064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of "mixing" procedure of mixed methods in health services research.
Zhang W; Creswell J
Med Care; 2013 Aug; 51(8):e51-7. PubMed ID: 23860333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research.
Armijo-Olivo S; Stiles CR; Hagen NA; Biondo PD; Cummings GG
J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Feb; 18(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 20698919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inter-rater reliability of sleep cyclic alternating pattern (CAP) scoring and validation of a new computer-assisted CAP scoring method.
Ferri R; Bruni O; Miano S; Smerieri A; Spruyt K; Terzano MG
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Mar; 116(3):696-707. PubMed ID: 15721084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework.
Tobin GA; Begley CM
J Adv Nurs; 2004 Nov; 48(4):388-96. PubMed ID: 15500533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Aggregation of qualitative studies--From theory to practice: Patient priorities and family medicine/general practice evaluations.
Reis S; Hermoni D; Van-Raalte R; Dahan R; Borkan JM
Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Feb; 65(2):214-22. PubMed ID: 17010557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
