These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2216907)

  • 1. An evaluation of marginal leakage of Class 2 combined amalgam-composite restorations.
    Eidelman E; Holan G; Tanzer-Sarneh S; Chosack A
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(4):141-8. PubMed ID: 2216907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Composite resin-amalgam compound restorations.
    Franchi M; Trisi P; Montanari G; Piattelli A
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Aug; 25(8):577-82. PubMed ID: 7568708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of different restorative techniques on microleakage in Class II cavities with gingival wall in cementum.
    Demarco FF; Ramos OL; Mota CS; Formolo E; Justino LM
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 11357567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
    Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage of class 2 Superbond-lined composite restorations with and without a cervical amalgam base.
    Hovav S; Holan G; Lewinstein I; Fuks AB
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 8700773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal adaptation of Class 5 composite restorations: retention grooves versus enamel and dentin bonding.
    Farid MR; Gomaa HM
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1271-5. PubMed ID: 9497668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A combined amalgam and composite resin restoration.
    Cardash HS; Bichacho N; Imber S; Liberman R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 May; 63(5):502-5. PubMed ID: 2338663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coronal microleakage of temporary restorations in previously restored teeth with amalgam and composite.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtasli MB; Ozdemir S
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(3):331-7. PubMed ID: 15986953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of Class V restorations using two different compomer systems: an in vitro study.
    Estafan D; Pines MS; Erakin C; Fuerst PF
    J Clin Dent; 1999; 10(4):124-6. PubMed ID: 10825860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Class I occlusal composite resin restorations: in vivo post-operative sensitivity, wall adaptation, and microleakage.
    Opdam NJ; Feilzer AJ; Roeters JJ; Smale I
    Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):229-34. PubMed ID: 10388382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of retention grooves on posterior composite resin restorations: an in vitro microleakage study.
    Shahani DR; Menezes JM
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(4):156-64. PubMed ID: 1287597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Choice of restorative materials in posterior Class V cavities].
    Piccirillo P; Marra R; Belnome G
    Arch Stomatol (Napoli); 1990; 31(3):579-84. PubMed ID: 2097973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reducing microleakage in composite resin restorations: an in vitro study.
    Unlu N; Krakaya S; Ozer F; Say EC
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2003 Dec; 11(4):171-5. PubMed ID: 14737794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An in vitro study of the effect of restorative technique on marginal leakage in posterior composites.
    Neiva IF; de Andrada MA; Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(6):282-9. PubMed ID: 9855849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage of resin composite restorations with glass-ceramic inserts.
    Olmez A; Oztaş N; Bilici S
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Nov; 29(11):725-9. PubMed ID: 10200722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of laser pretreated enamel and dentin of primary teeth on microleakage of different restorative materials.
    Salama FS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 9796497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cusp fracture resistance in composite-amalgam combined restorations.
    Franchi M; Breschi L; Ruggeri O
    J Dent; 1999 Jan; 27(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 9922612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.