These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22169230)

  • 1. Agreement and reading time for differently-priced devices for the digital capture of X-ray films.
    Salazar AJ; Camacho JC; Aguirre DA
    J Telemed Telecare; 2012 Mar; 18(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 22169230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between differently priced devices for digital capture of X-ray films using computed tomography as a gold standard: a multireader-multicase receiver operating characteristic curve study.
    Salazar AJ; Camacho JC; Aguirre DA
    Telemed J E Health; 2011 May; 17(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 21457011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpretation accuracy of a CCD film digitizer.
    Gitlin JN; Scott WW; Bell K; Narayan A
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 12105698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The economic expediency of digital fluorography].
    Blinov NN; Gubenko MB; Utkin PM
    Med Tekh; 1999; (5):41-4. PubMed ID: 10560099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [An economic comparison between digital luminescence radiography and conventional film processing in intensive care medicine].
    Peters PE; Dykstra DE; Wiesmann W; Schlüchtermann J; Adam D
    Radiologe; 1992 Nov; 32(11):536-40. PubMed ID: 1461981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital detectors in mammography. A technological overview.
    Dhaenens F
    JBR-BTR; 2000 Apr; 83(2):84-7. PubMed ID: 10859905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic accuracy of digitized chest X-rays using consumer-grade color displays for low-cost teleradiology services: a multireader-multicase comparison.
    Salazar AJ; Aguirre DA; Ocampo J; Diaz XA; Camacho JC
    Telemed J E Health; 2014 Apr; 20(4):304-11. PubMed ID: 24506568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
    Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digitizing pediatric chest radiographs: comparison of low-cost, commercial off-the-shelf technologies.
    Ruess L; Uyehara CF; Shiels KC; Cho KH; O'Connor SC; Person DA; Whitton RK
    Pediatr Radiol; 2001 Dec; 31(12):841-7. PubMed ID: 11727017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Obstacles remain on road to digital mammography.
    Johnson M
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D19-21. PubMed ID: 10724731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The diagnostic value of digital and conventional imaging in intravenous urography].
    Hundt C; Kohz P; Leinsinger G; Fink U; Schätzl M
    Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):395-9. PubMed ID: 8527752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Grassl U; Schulze RK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
    Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison between different cost devices for digital capture of X-ray films: an image characteristics detection approach.
    Salazar AJ; Camacho JC; Aguirre DA
    J Digit Imaging; 2012 Feb; 25(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 21614654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of digital radiography using stimulable phosphor for diagnosis of pneumothorax.
    Kehler M; Albrechtsson U; Andrésdóttir A; Lárusdóttir H; Lundin A
    Acta Radiol; 1990 Jan; 31(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 2187511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Digital radiography. Cost-benefit analysis].
    Braunschweig R; Pistitsch C; Nissen-Meyer S
    Radiologe; 1996 Apr; 36(4):306-14. PubMed ID: 8677323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Signal detection in digital chest-phantom images acquired with an image intensifier.
    Brauer GW; Fisher PD; Hanley JA; Ritchie GW
    J Digit Imaging; 1989 Feb; 2(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 2488152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CCD-based X-ray area detector for time-resolved diffraction experiments.
    Yagi N; Inoue K; Oka T
    J Synchrotron Radiat; 2004 Nov; 11(Pt 6):456-61. PubMed ID: 15496732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital mammography: a model for assessing cost-effectiveness.
    Nields MW; Galaty RR
    Acad Radiol; 1998 Sep; 5 Suppl 2():S310-3. PubMed ID: 9750840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.