139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22169396)
1. Midwifery group practice and mode of birth.
Beckmann M; Kildea S; Gibbons K
Women Birth; 2012 Dec; 25(4):187-93. PubMed ID: 22169396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of partnership caseload midwifery care with conventional team midwifery care: labour and birth outcomes.
Benjamin Y; Walsh D; Taub N
Midwifery; 2001 Sep; 17(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 11502143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of Midwifery Group Practice. Part I: clinical effectiveness.
Turnbull D; Baghurst P; Collins C; Cornwell C; Nixon A; Donnelan-Fernandez R; Antoniou G
Women Birth; 2009 Mar; 22(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 19101219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An evaluation of Midwifery Group Practice. Part II: women's satisfaction.
Fereday J; Collins C; Turnbull D; Pincombe J; Oster C
Women Birth; 2009 Mar; 22(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 18926788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A non-randomised trial investigating the cost-effectiveness of Midwifery Group Practice compared with standard maternity care arrangements in one Australian hospital.
Toohill J; Turkstra E; Gamble J; Scuffham PA
Midwifery; 2012 Dec; 28(6):e874-9. PubMed ID: 22172743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of timing of admission in labour and management of labour on method of birth: results from a randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery (COSMOS trial).
Davey MA; McLachlan HL; Forster D; Flood M
Midwifery; 2013 Dec; 29(12):1297-302. PubMed ID: 23890679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Labour outcomes in caseload midwifery and standard care: a register-based cohort study.
Jepsen I; Juul S; Foureur MJ; Sørensen EE; Nohr EA
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Dec; 18(1):481. PubMed ID: 30522453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) on caesarean section rates in women of low obstetric risk: the COSMOS randomised controlled trial.
McLachlan HL; Forster DA; Davey MA; Farrell T; Gold L; Biro MA; Albers L; Flood M; Oats J; Waldenström U
BJOG; 2012 Nov; 119(12):1483-92. PubMed ID: 22830446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of independent midwifery attended births in birth centres and home births: a retrospective cohort study in Japan.
Kataoka Y; Eto H; Iida M
Midwifery; 2013 Aug; 29(8):965-72. PubMed ID: 23415360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical outcomes of the first midwife-led normal birth unit in China: a retrospective cohort study.
Cheung NF; Mander R; Wang X; Fu W; Zhou H; Zhang L
Midwifery; 2011 Oct; 27(5):582-7. PubMed ID: 21236528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An overview of the first 'no exit' midwifery group practice in a tertiary maternity hospital in Western Australia: Outcomes, satisfaction and perceptions of care.
Lewis L; Hauck YL; Crichton C; Pemberton A; Spence M; Kelly G
Women Birth; 2016 Dec; 29(6):494-502. PubMed ID: 27199172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Have women become more willing to accept obstetric interventions and does this relate to mode of birth? Data from a prospective study.
Green JM; Baston HA
Birth; 2007 Mar; 34(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 17324172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Caseload midwifery care versus standard maternity care for women of any risk: M@NGO, a randomised controlled trial.
Tracy SK; Hartz DL; Tracy MB; Allen J; Forti A; Hall B; White J; Lainchbury A; Stapleton H; Beckmann M; Bisits A; Homer C; Foureur M; Welsh A; Kildea S
Lancet; 2013 Nov; 382(9906):1723-32. PubMed ID: 24050808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the effect of caseload midwifery program and standard midwifery-led care on primiparous birth outcomes: A retrospective cohort matching study.
Gidaszewski B; Khajehei M; Gibbs E; Chua SC
Midwifery; 2019 Feb; 69():10-16. PubMed ID: 30390462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An evaluation of the satisfaction of midwives' working in midwifery group practice.
Collins CT; Fereday J; Pincombe J; Oster C; Turnbull D
Midwifery; 2010 Aug; 26(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 19781827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mode of delivery after epidural analgesia in a cohort of low-risk nulliparas.
Eriksen LM; Nohr EA; Kjaergaard H
Birth; 2011 Dec; 38(4):317-26. PubMed ID: 22112332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors associated with non-normal birth outcomes for low-risk women in an inner-city hospital.
McDermott AM
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2010; 55(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 20189128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Regardless of where they give birth, women living in non-metropolitan areas are less likely to have an epidural than their metropolitan counterparts.
Powers JR; Loxton DJ; O'Mara AT; Chojenta CL; Ebert L
Women Birth; 2013 Jun; 26(2):e77-81. PubMed ID: 23276587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exploration of preterm birth rates associated with different models of antenatal midwifery care in Scotland: Unmatched retrospective cohort analysis.
Symon A; Winter C; Cochrane L
Midwifery; 2015 Jun; 31(6):590-6. PubMed ID: 25819706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating Maternity Units: a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwife-led primary maternity units in New Zealand-clinical outcomes.
Grigg CP; Tracy SK; Tracy M; Daellenbach R; Kensington M; Monk A; Schmied V
BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e016288. PubMed ID: 28851782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
