BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22170449)

  • 1. The effect of standard and low-modulus cement augmentation on the stiffness, strength, and endplate pressure distribution in vertebroplasty.
    Kinzl M; Benneker LM; Boger A; Zysset PK; Pahr DH
    Eur Spine J; 2012 May; 21(5):920-9. PubMed ID: 22170449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty: a biomechanical study of low-modulus PMMA cement.
    Boger A; Heini P; Windolf M; Schneider E
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Dec; 16(12):2118-25. PubMed ID: 17713795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vertebroplasty: only small cement volumes are required to normalize stress distributions on the vertebral bodies.
    Luo J; Daines L; Charalambous A; Adams MA; Annesley-Williams DJ; Dolan P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(26):2865-73. PubMed ID: 20010394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical evaluation of an injectable calcium phosphate cement for vertebroplasty.
    Lim TH; Brebach GT; Renner SM; Kim WJ; Kim JG; Lee RE; Andersson GB; An HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Jun; 27(12):1297-302. PubMed ID: 12065977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cement distribution, volume, and compliance in vertebroplasty: some answers from an anatomy-based nonlinear finite element study.
    Chevalier Y; Pahr D; Charlebois M; Heini P; Schneider E; Zysset P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(16):1722-30. PubMed ID: 18628704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of calcium phosphate cement for the augmentation of traumatically fractured porcine specimens using vertebroplasty.
    Tarsuslugil SM; O'Hara RM; Dunne NJ; Buchanan FJ; Orr JF; Barton DC; Wilcox RK
    J Biomech; 2013 Feb; 46(4):711-5. PubMed ID: 23261249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vertebroplasty with high-viscosity polymethylmethacrylate cement facilitates vertebral body restoration in vitro.
    Rüger M; Schmoelz W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(24):2619-25. PubMed ID: 19881400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanics of low-modulus and standard acrylic bone cements in simulated vertebroplasty: A human ex vivo study.
    Holub O; López A; Borse V; Engqvist H; Kapur N; Hall RM; Persson C
    J Biomech; 2015 Sep; 48(12):3258-66. PubMed ID: 26189096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical effects of unipedicular vertebroplasty on intact vertebrae.
    Higgins KB; Harten RD; Langrana NA; Reiter MF
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1540-7; discussion 1548. PubMed ID: 12865841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A biomechanical investigation of vertebroplasty in osteoporotic compression fractures and in prophylactic vertebral reinforcement.
    Furtado N; Oakland RJ; Wilcox RK; Hall RM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(17):E480-7. PubMed ID: 17762281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of endplate-to-endplate cement augmentation on vertebral strength and stiffness in vertebroplasty.
    Steens J; Verdonschot N; Aalsma AM; Hosman AJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(15):E419-22. PubMed ID: 17621198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical behavior of MRI-signal-inducing bone cements after vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral bodies: An experimental cadaver study.
    Wichlas F; Trzenschik H; Tsitsilonis S; Rohlmann A; Bail HJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 May; 29(5):571-6. PubMed ID: 24703828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility study of using viscoplastic bone cement for vertebroplasty: an in vivo clinical trial and in vitro cadaveric biomechanical examination.
    Lin SW; Chiang CK; Yang CL; Wang JL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(10):E385-91. PubMed ID: 20393389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is kyphoplasty better than vertebroplasty in restoring normal mechanical function to an injured spine?
    Luo J; Bertram W; Sangar D; Adams MA; Annesley-Williams DJ; Dolan P
    Bone; 2010 Apr; 46(4):1050-7. PubMed ID: 20004264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The biomechanics of vertebroplasty. The effect of cement volume on mechanical behavior.
    Belkoff SM; Mathis JM; Jasper LE; Deramond H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jul; 26(14):1537-41. PubMed ID: 11462082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimum cement volume for vertebroplasty.
    Martinčič D; Brojan M; Kosel F; Štern D; Vrtovec T; Antolič V; Vengust R
    Int Orthop; 2015 Apr; 39(4):727-33. PubMed ID: 25500712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical comparison of vertebral augmentation with silicone and PMMA cement and two filling grades.
    Schulte TL; Keiler A; Riechelmann F; Lange T; Schmoelz W
    Eur Spine J; 2013 Dec; 22(12):2695-701. PubMed ID: 23880868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Biomechanical study of polymethyl methacrylate bone cement and allogeneic bone for strengthening sheep vertebrae].
    Wang Z; Zhang X; Li Z; Feng Q; Chen J; Xie W
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 35(4):471-476. PubMed ID: 33855832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Balloon vertebroplasty with calcium phosphate cement augmentation for direct restoration of traumatic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures.
    Verlaan JJ; van Helden WH; Oner FC; Verbout AJ; Dhert WJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Mar; 27(5):543-8. PubMed ID: 11880842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures.
    Tohmeh AG; Mathis JM; Fenton DC; Levine AM; Belkoff SM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Sep; 24(17):1772-6. PubMed ID: 10488505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.